Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;5(3):394-402; quiz 267.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.005.

The utility of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation in a United States referral population

Affiliations

The utility of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation in a United States referral population

Apinya Leerapun et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Background & aims: The percentage of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive (alpha)-fetoprotein (AFP-L3%) is proposed as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We evaluated the utility of AFP-L3% for diagnosis of HCC in a US referral population.

Methods: This retrospective study included 272 patients: 166 with HCC and 106 with benign liver disease (chronic liver disease, 77; benign liver mass, 29). The AFP-L3% was measured using a clinical auto-analyzer.

Results: The AFP-L3% is not reported for a total alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) less than 10 ng/mL, and all patients with an AFP greater than 200 ng/mL had HCC; thus the AFP-L3% was noninformative for these patients. In patients with a total AFP of 10-200 ng/mL, an AFP-L3% greater than 10% had a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 63% for diagnosis of HCC. An AFP-L3% greater than 35% had a reduced sensitivity of 33%, but an increased specificity of 100%. The high specificity of the AFP-L3% cut-off of 35% allowed the confident diagnosis of an additional 10% of HCCs not diagnosed using an AFP cut-off of 200 ng/mL. After adjustment for AFP level, no association was observed between AFP-L3% and tumor size, stage, vascular invasion, grade, or survival.

Conclusions: Patients with indeterminate total AFP values of 10-200 ng/mL present a diagnostic dilemma. We found that an AFP-L3% greater than 35% has 100% specificity for HCC in these patients. AFP-L3%, used in combination with AFP, may be a clinically useful adjunct marker for the diagnosis of HCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing total AFP with AFP-L3% for diagnosis of HCC in individuals with total AFP greater than 10 ng/ml. Figure 1B. ROC curves comparing total AFP with AFP-L3% for diagnosis of HCC in individuals with total AFP between 10 and 200 ng/ml.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing total AFP with AFP-L3% for diagnosis of HCC in individuals with total AFP greater than 10 ng/ml. Figure 1B. ROC curves comparing total AFP with AFP-L3% for diagnosis of HCC in individuals with total AFP between 10 and 200 ng/ml.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scatter plot of AFP-L3 by AFP category
For individuals with a total AFP in the indeterminate range of 10-200 ng/ml, an AFP-L3% of greater than 35% was 100% specific, with no false positives. The curved line represents an absolute AFP-L3 cut-off value of 11 ng/ml, which was also 100% specific. NR: AFP-L3 values are non-specific and not reported when total AFP is in the range 0.8 - 10 ng/ml and AFP-L3 is >0.5%.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of AFP-L3 level by tumor characteristics
Histograms showing the relationship between AFP-L3% and tumor characteristics: 3A, tumor size; 3B, tumor stage; 3C, vascular invasion; and 3D, histologic grade. The means were calculated without taking into consideration AFP-L3 values which were not detected (ND), not reported (NR), not measurable because the total AFP was undetected (U), or not measurable because the total AFP was >300,000 ng/ml (H). There is little effect of L3% for tumor size, tumor grade, and vascular involvement. There is a possible trend for TNM, but the numbers are small.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of AFP-L3 level by tumor characteristics
Histograms showing the relationship between AFP-L3% and tumor characteristics: 3A, tumor size; 3B, tumor stage; 3C, vascular invasion; and 3D, histologic grade. The means were calculated without taking into consideration AFP-L3 values which were not detected (ND), not reported (NR), not measurable because the total AFP was undetected (U), or not measurable because the total AFP was >300,000 ng/ml (H). There is little effect of L3% for tumor size, tumor grade, and vascular involvement. There is a possible trend for TNM, but the numbers are small.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of AFP-L3 level by tumor characteristics
Histograms showing the relationship between AFP-L3% and tumor characteristics: 3A, tumor size; 3B, tumor stage; 3C, vascular invasion; and 3D, histologic grade. The means were calculated without taking into consideration AFP-L3 values which were not detected (ND), not reported (NR), not measurable because the total AFP was undetected (U), or not measurable because the total AFP was >300,000 ng/ml (H). There is little effect of L3% for tumor size, tumor grade, and vascular involvement. There is a possible trend for TNM, but the numbers are small.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of AFP-L3 level by tumor characteristics
Histograms showing the relationship between AFP-L3% and tumor characteristics: 3A, tumor size; 3B, tumor stage; 3C, vascular invasion; and 3D, histologic grade. The means were calculated without taking into consideration AFP-L3 values which were not detected (ND), not reported (NR), not measurable because the total AFP was undetected (U), or not measurable because the total AFP was >300,000 ng/ml (H). There is little effect of L3% for tumor size, tumor grade, and vascular involvement. There is a possible trend for TNM, but the numbers are small.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by AFP-L3% level and total AFP level
4A: AFP-L3% level >10% predicts survival of patients with HCC (p=0.0012). 4B: Total AFP >200 ng/ml is a better predictor of survival of HCC patients (p<0.0001). Once total AFP is taken into account, there is no additional prognostic value of the AFP-L3% in this cohort.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients by AFP-L3% level and total AFP level
4A: AFP-L3% level >10% predicts survival of patients with HCC (p=0.0012). 4B: Total AFP >200 ng/ml is a better predictor of survival of HCC patients (p<0.0001). Once total AFP is taken into account, there is no additional prognostic value of the AFP-L3% in this cohort.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. El-Serag HB, Davila JA, Petersen NJ, McGlynn KA. The continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:817–23. - PubMed
    1. El-Serag HB, Mason AC, Key C. Trends in survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma between 1977 and 1996 in the United States. Hepatology. 2001;33:62–5. - PubMed
    1. El-Serag HB, Siegel AB, Davila JA, Shaib YH, Cayton-Woody M, McBride R, McGlynn KA. Treatment and outcomes of treating of hepatocellular carcinoma among Medicare recipients in the United States: a population-based study. J Hepatol. 2006;44:158–66. - PubMed
    1. Hayashi K, Kumada T, Nakano S, Takeda I, Sugiyama K, Kiriyama S, Sone Y, Miyata A, Shimizu H, Satomura S. Usefulness of measurement of Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of alpha-fetoprotein as a marker of prognosis and recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3028–33. - PubMed
    1. Okuda K, Tanaka M, Kanazawa N, Nagashima J, Satomura S, Kinoshita H, Eriguchi N, Aoyagi S, Kojiro M. Evaluation of curability and prediction of prognosis after surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma by lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein. Int J Oncol. 1999;14:265–71. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms