Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial
- PMID: 17368247
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.08.009
Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, controlled trial
Abstract
Study objective: Minimally invasive surgery aims to achieve at least a similar clinical effectiveness with a quicker recovery than traditional open techniques. Although there have been numerous randomized clinical trials comparing laparoscopic hysterectomy with hysterectomy by laparotomy, only a few studies have compared quality of life after different types of hysterectomy. None of these studies evaluated total laparoscopic hysterectomy. In this paper, we report on a randomized comparison of quality of life after total laparoscopic versus total abdominal hysterectomy.
Design: Randomized, controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).
Setting: Single-center teaching hospital in The Netherlands.
Patients: Patients scheduled for hysterectomy for a benign condition, in whom a vaginal hysterectomy was not possible and laparoscopic hysterectomy was feasible (mobile uterus not exceeding the size of 18 weeks' gestation).
Interventions: Abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Measurements and main results: Patients completed the Dutch version RAND-36 health survey preoperatively as well as at 5 time points in the first 12 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome of the study was quality of life as measured by the RAND-36. A linear mixed model was used for statistical analysis while accounting for baseline values. Secondary outcomes were hospital stay and complications. There were 88 patients eligible, of whom 59 gave consent for randomization. Twenty-seven women were allocated to the laparoscopic arm and 32 to the abdominal arm. We found a significant treatment effect favoring laparoscopic hysterectomy in the RAND-36 scale for vitality. Laparoscopic hysterectomy performed better on all other scales of the RAND-36, but these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy results in more postoperative vitality when compared with abdominal hysterectomy. For this reason, all women with a benign condition requiring abdominal hysterectomy, in whom the laparoscopic approach is feasible, should have the chance to choose laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Similar articles
-
Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19835801
-
Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jan;119(1):85-91. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823d3b00. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. PMID: 22183215 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15904592
-
Health technology assessment of surgical therapies for benign gynaecological disease.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Dec;20(6):841-79. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.11.006. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006. PMID: 17145485 Review.
-
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.033. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011. PMID: 21664034 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotically assisted hysterectomy: 100 cases after the learning curve.J Robot Surg. 2010 May;4(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0174-2. Epub 2010 Mar 18. J Robot Surg. 2010. PMID: 27638566
-
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Complications of Different Hysterectomy Techniques in the Management of Uterine Fibroids.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2428-S2430. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_236_24. Epub 2024 Jul 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 39346314 Free PMC article.
-
Age should not be a limiting factor in laparoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter cohort study on quality of life after laparoscopic hysterectomy.Clin Interv Aging. 2018 Dec 13;13:2517-2526. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S172965. eCollection 2018. Clin Interv Aging. 2018. PMID: 30587944 Free PMC article.
-
The feasibility of scarless single-port transumbilical total laparoscopic hysterectomy: initial clinical experience.Surg Endosc. 2010 Jul;24(7):1686-92. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0830-7. Epub 2009 Dec 25. Surg Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20035346
-
Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy versus laparoscopic total hysterectomy: a decade of experience.Gynecol Surg. 2010 Feb;7(1):9-12. doi: 10.1007/s10397-009-0529-8. Epub 2009 Nov 14. Gynecol Surg. 2010. PMID: 20234836 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical