Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Feb 26;12(2):47-53.

Current status of radical systematic lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer--a review of the literature

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17369117
Review

Current status of radical systematic lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer--a review of the literature

Matthias Peiper et al. Eur J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of death in malignancies with an incidence of 8-12 cases per 100000 in western world. In spite of numerous modifications in therapeutical approaches, prognosis has not improved.

Methods: In the last few years numerous studies have been performed to reduce tumor mortality with more radical surgical procedures. Several articles of the last 15 years have been investigated to objectivate the benefit of extended lymphadenectomy in pancreatic surgery. Staging of the cancers, prognostic factors, technique and interpretation of lymphadenectomy have been analysed

Results: All studies document a lowered perioperative mortality in pancreatic resections. The procedure is counted as a standardized and safe one. However, several controversies exist. The distinct staging systems in Japan and the western world aggravate the comparison in all studies. Japanese authors in mostly retrospective analyses seem to document a survival benefit by radical surgery. Similar results could not be achieved by western authors.

Conclusion: Over all, a significant benefit in extreme radical surgery could not bee found. However, there are indications of subgroups of patients in whom extended lymphadenectomy might be beneficial. This subgroup should be defined only by large multicentric, prospective, randomized studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources