Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;13(1):82-8.
doi: 10.3201/eid1301.060481.

Subtypes of Cryptosporidium parvum in humans and disease risk

Affiliations

Subtypes of Cryptosporidium parvum in humans and disease risk

Paul R Hunter et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

The 2 main species of Cryptosporidium that infect humans are Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum. Here, multilocus fragment analysis of 3 microsatellite loci (ML1, ML2, and gp60) was used to subtype strains from sporadic cases of cryptosporidiosis in Wales and northwest England. Of 72 strains of C. parvum, 63 were typeable at all 3 loci, forming 31 subtypes. These strains formed 3 broad clusters, representing 74.6%, 20.6%, and 4.8% of typeable strains. Of 118 C. hominis strains, 106 were typeable at all 3 loci, forming 9 subtypes; however, 90% belonged to the same subtype. Analysis with epidemiologic data found an association between strains from case-patients who reported contact with farm animals and individual C. parvum microsatellite alleles. The strongest association was with ML1; all strains from case-patients that reported farm animal contact had the same allele (ML1-242). Microsatellite typing of C. parvum provides valuable additional information on the epidemiology of this pathogen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Product size at microsatellite locus ML1 with number of Cryptosporidium parvum case-patients who touched or handled farm animals before onset of illness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Product size at microsatellite locus ML2 with number of Cryptosporidium parvum case-patients who touched or handled farm animals before onset of illness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Product size at microsatellite locus gp60 with number of Cryptosporidium parvum case-patients who touched or handled farm animals before onset of illness.

References

    1. McLauchlin J, Amar C, Pedraza-Díaz S, Nichols GL. Molecular epidemiological analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in the United Kingdom: results of genotyping Cryptosporidium spp. in 1705 fecal samples from humans and 105 fecal samples from livestock animals. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3984–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The development of a national collection for oocysts of Cryptosporidium. Foundation for Water Research, Marlow, Bucks, UK, 2002. [cited 2006 Oct 11]. Available from http://www.fwr.org/
    1. Chen X-M, Keithly JS, Paya CV, LaRusso NF. Cryptosporidiosis. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1723–31. 10.1056/NEJMra013170 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health Protection Agency. 2006. [cited 2006 Oct 11]. Available from http://www.hpa.org.uk/
    1. Hunter PR, Nichols G. The epidemiology and clinical features of cryptosporidium infection in immune-compromised patients. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:145–54. 10.1128/CMR.15.1.145-154.2002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types