Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response
- PMID: 17372664
- DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0785-y
Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response
Comment on
-
Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1586-91. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0601-0. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16855805
Similar articles
-
Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):867-8; author reply 869-70. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0670-8. World J Surg. 2007. PMID: 17219267 No abstract available.
-
Experimental comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes: less weight does not mean less biological response.World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1586-91. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0601-0. World J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16855805
-
In vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models: a review of biocompatibility.Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3029-1. Epub 2016 May 23. Int Urogynecol J. 2017. PMID: 27216918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area.Hernia. 2004 Dec;8(4):365-72. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0268-8. Hernia. 2004. PMID: 15309687
-
[Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002 Oct;31(6):527-40. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2002. PMID: 12407323 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Surgical mesh for ventral incisional hernia repairs: Understanding mesh design.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016 Spring;24(1):41-50. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000955. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016. PMID: 27054138 Free PMC article. Review.