Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors
- PMID: 17372709
- DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0637-x
Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors
Abstract
Background and aim: The interrelation between retroclination of the maxillary central incisors and dentofacial parameters is a controversial subject in the literature. In contrast to comparisons between malocclusion and control groups, the objective of the present study was to identify skeletal, dentoalveolar or perioral (soft-tissue) factors which primarily determine how severely retroclination is individually manifested.
Materials and methods: For this purpose we evaluated the pretherapeutic lateral cephalograms of 83 patients with an inclination of the maxillary central incisors ranging from physiological values to very severe retroclination (inclination to anterior cranial base between 104 degrees and 64 degrees ). A detailed analysis of the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft-tissue morphology was performed using lateral cephalograms taken prior to therapy. The statistical analysis included the calculation of multiple regression models for maxillary central incisor inclination and different parameters describing the lip-to-incisor relationship as dependent variables.
Results: A regression model including 1) the lip-line level measured at the dorsal upper-lower lip contact point, 2) the sagittal intermaxillary relationship, and 3) the inclination of the mandibular central incisors explained 81% of the variability in maxillary central incisor inclination (p < 0.0001 for all three parameters). Statistical analysis of the morphologic base of a high dorsal lip-line level (i.e., the predominant characteristic in the retroclination cases) revealed the significance of soft-tissue, dentoalveolar, and skeletal variables (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Complementary to results of previous resting lippressure measurements, this cephalometric study suggests that a high lip-line level is the predominant causative factor for a cover- bite or Class II, Division 2 malocclusion. Therefore, we conclude that (1) lip-line measurements should be included in routine cephalometric diagnostics, and (2) that a high lip-line must be eliminated by therapeutic measures in these malocclusions to prevent a post-orthodontic relapse.
Comment in
-
On B.G. Lapatki et al.: Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors.J Orofac Orthop. 2007 Jul;68(4):328; author reply 329-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-007-9637-0. J Orofac Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17639281 English, German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
On B.G. Lapatki et al.: Dentofacial parameters explaining variability in retroclination of the maxillary central incisors.J Orofac Orthop. 2007 Jul;68(4):328; author reply 329-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-007-9637-0. J Orofac Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17639281 English, German. No abstract available.
-
Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.033. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015. PMID: 26321338
-
A retrospective cephalometric study for the quantitative assessment of relapse factors in cover-bite treatment.J Orofac Orthop. 2004 Nov;65(6):475-88. doi: 10.1007/s00056-004-0412-1. J Orofac Orthop. 2004. PMID: 15570406 English, German.
-
Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of class II malocclusion treatment using bi-maxillary skeletal anchorage: a systematic review.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02363-3. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 35948959 Free PMC article.
-
Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes in growing class II malocclusion patients during nonextraction orthodontic treatment.SADJ. 2006 Sep;61(8):344-50. SADJ. 2006. PMID: 17165248 Review.
Cited by
-
[Craniofacial morphology of child and adult deepbite: a cross-sectional study].Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Jun;32(3):246-51. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2014.03.009. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014. PMID: 25033639 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Changes in lips, cheeks and tongue pressures after upper incisor protrusion in Class II division 2 malocclusion: a prospective study.Prog Orthod. 2017 Sep 25;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0182-0. Prog Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28944417 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in Orbicularis Oris Superior and Masseter Muscle Activities After Upper Incisor Protrusion in Class II Division 2 Malocclusion: An Electromyographic Study.Turk J Orthod. 2022 Dec;35(4):231-238. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21001. Turk J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36594543 Free PMC article.
-
Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?J Orofac Orthop. 2013 May;74(3):187-204. doi: 10.1007/s00056-013-0139-y. Epub 2013 May 9. J Orofac Orthop. 2013. PMID: 23652739
-
Evaluation of anterior teeth crown-root morphology and alveolar bone structure in patients with closed deep overbite using cone beam computed tomography.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 21;14(1):24670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75642-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39433575 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources