What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns
- PMID: 17372839
- DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9053-z
What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns
Abstract
Two eye-tracking studies assessed effects of grammatical and conceptual gender cues in generic role name processing in German. Participants read passages about a social or occupational group introduced by way of a generic role name (e.g., Soldaten/soldiers, Künstler/artists). Later in the passage the gender of this group was specified by the anaphoric expression diese Männer/these men or diese Frauen/these women. Testing masculine generic role names of male, female or neutral conceptual gender (Exp. 1) showed that a gender mismatch between the role name's conceptual gender and the anaphor significantly slowed reading immediately before and after the anaphoric noun. A mismatch between the antecedent's grammatical gender and the anaphor slowed down the reading of the anaphoric noun itself. Testing grammatically gender-unmarked role names (Exp. 2) revealed a general male bias in participants' understanding, irrespective of grammatical or conceptual gender. The experiments extend previous findings on gender effects to non-referential role names and generic contexts. Theoretical aspects of gender and plural reference as well as gender information in mental models are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature.Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01356. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26441732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effects of order of mention and grammatical role on anaphor resolution.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):501-25. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000041. Epub 2014 Jul 28. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015. PMID: 25068852
-
Effects of role typicality on processing person information in German: evidence from an ERP study.Brain Res. 2010 Sep 24;1353:133-44. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.018. Epub 2010 Jul 15. Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 20637743
-
On the semantic content of grammatical gender and its impact on the representation of human referents.Exp Psychol. 2010;57(5):367-75. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000044. Exp Psychol. 2010. PMID: 20178923
-
Proper names and how they are learned.Memory. 1993 Dec;1(4):433-55. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258247. Memory. 1993. PMID: 7584281 Review.
Cited by
-
Role descriptions induce gender mismatch effects in eye movements during reading.Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 3;6:1607. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01607. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26579003 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-linguistic evidence for gender as a prominence feature.Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 8;6:1356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01356. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26441732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance-related feedback as a strategy to overcome spontaneous occupational stereotypes.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Jun;77(6):1312-1331. doi: 10.1177/17470218231196861. Epub 2023 Sep 8. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024. PMID: 37578102 Free PMC article.
-
Norms on the Gender Perception of Role Nouns: Gender Ratio Data for Chinese, Finnish, and Russian.J Open Psychol Data. 2023 Jan 20;11:2. doi: 10.5334/jopd.73. eCollection 2023. J Open Psychol Data. 2023. PMID: 40687109 Free PMC article.
-
The male bias of a generically-intended masculine pronoun: Evidence from eye-tracking and sentence evaluation.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0249309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249309. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33793618 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources