Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov;36(6):431-56.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9053-z.

What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns

Affiliations

What's in a (role) name? Formal and conceptual aspects of comprehending personal nouns

Lisa Irmen. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Nov.

Abstract

Two eye-tracking studies assessed effects of grammatical and conceptual gender cues in generic role name processing in German. Participants read passages about a social or occupational group introduced by way of a generic role name (e.g., Soldaten/soldiers, Künstler/artists). Later in the passage the gender of this group was specified by the anaphoric expression diese Männer/these men or diese Frauen/these women. Testing masculine generic role names of male, female or neutral conceptual gender (Exp. 1) showed that a gender mismatch between the role name's conceptual gender and the anaphor significantly slowed reading immediately before and after the anaphoric noun. A mismatch between the antecedent's grammatical gender and the anaphor slowed down the reading of the anaphoric noun itself. Testing grammatically gender-unmarked role names (Exp. 2) revealed a general male bias in participants' understanding, irrespective of grammatical or conceptual gender. The experiments extend previous findings on gender effects to non-referential role names and generic contexts. Theoretical aspects of gender and plural reference as well as gender information in mental models are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1996 Aug;49(3):639-63 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 2005 Sep;33(6):972-83 - PubMed
    1. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Feb;53(1):23-52 - PubMed
    1. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Nov;14(3):333-46 - PubMed
    1. Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):273-85 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources