Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;15(1):13-23.
doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0035-3.

Becoming in-formed: genetic counselling, ambiguity and choice

Affiliations

Becoming in-formed: genetic counselling, ambiguity and choice

Joanna Latimer. Health Care Anal. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

The paper presents findings from an ethnography of dysmorphology, a specialism in genetic medicine, to explore genetic counselling as a process through which parents 'become informed.' Current professional and policy debate over the use of genetic technology in medicine emphasises the need for informed choice making, and for genetic services that provide parents with what is referred to as 'non-directive genetic counselling.' In the paper the process of becoming informed is shown to be very specific and to have its own effects. Specifically, genetics is performed in dysmorphology as a space of ambiguity and uncertainty. In addition, parents are engaged by the clinic as participants in the very processes through which their child, and perhaps their family, are clinically classified. The paper examines the effects of parents' immersion in this clinical space of deferral to suggest how the need for reproductive choice, and calculation, is predicated upon clinical processes that shift parents between the experience of definition and uncertainty. The paper thus troubles simple stories about autonomous and informed choice, particularly reproductive choice, as icons of contemporary versions of what it is to be fully human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Br J Sociol. 2002 Dec;53(4):621-38 - PubMed
    1. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Sep;12(3):245-64 - PubMed
    1. Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Jan;25(1):50-70 - PubMed
    1. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Mar;60(6):1299-309 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):723-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources