Comment
. 2007 Jul 20;26(16):3208-10; author reply 3210-2.
doi: 10.1002/sim.2878.
Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study (p n/a) by Peter C. Austin, Paul Grootendorst, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Geoffrey M. Anderson, Statistics in Medicine, Published Online: 16 June 2006. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2618
- PMID: 17373674
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.2878
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study (p n/a) by Peter C. Austin, Paul Grootendorst, Sharon-Lise T. Normand, Geoffrey M. Anderson, Statistics in Medicine, Published Online: 16 June 2006. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2618
Stat Med.
.
No abstract available
Comment on
-
Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):754-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.2618. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 16783757
Similar articles
-
Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):754-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.2618. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 16783757
-
[A Monte-Carlo study for propensity score methods].Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Jun;26(6):458-62. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005. PMID: 16185467 Chinese.
-
Discussion of research using propensity-score matching: comments on 'A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2055-61; discussion 2066-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3245. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 18446836 No abstract available.
-
Developing practical recommendations for the use of propensity scores: discussion of 'A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003' by Peter Austin, Statistics in Medicine.Stat Med. 2008 May 30;27(12):2062-5; discussion 2066-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3207. Stat Med. 2008. PMID: 18286673 No abstract available.
-
Are propensity scores really superior to standard multivariable analysis?Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 Sep;32(5):731-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 May 16. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011. PMID: 21616172 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 May 30;12:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-70. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012. PMID: 22646911 Free PMC article.
-
Modelling hospital outcome: problems with endogeneity.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01251-8. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021. PMID: 34154530 Free PMC article.
-
Adjustment for Baseline Covariates to Increase Efficiency in RCTs with Binary Endpoint: A Comparison of Bayesian and Frequentist Approaches.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157758. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34360051 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of unmeasured baseline effect modification on estimates from an inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic model.Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(7):343-9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9341-z. Epub 2009 May 6. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19418232