Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Dec 5;132(3):264-272.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.033. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

Initial validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP)

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Initial validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP)

Liisa Holsti et al. Pain. .

Abstract

Accurate pain assessment in preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is complex. Infants who are born at early gestational ages (GA), and who have had greater early pain exposure, have dampened facial responses which may lead to under-treatment. Since behavioral and physiological responses to pain in infants are often dissociated, using multidimensional scales which combine these indicators into a single score may limit our ability to determine the effects of interventions on each system. Our aim was to design a unidimensional scale which would combine the relatively most specific, individual, behavioral indicators for assessing acute pain in this population. The Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP) combines sleep/wake states, 5 facial actions and 2 hand actions. Ninety-two infants born between 23 and 32 weeks GA were assessed during 3, 1 min Phases of blood collection. Outcome measures included changes in BIIP and in Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) scores coded in real time from continuous bedside video recordings; changes in heart rate (HR) were obtained using custom physiological processing software. Scores on the BIIP changed significantly across Phases of blood collection (p<0.01). Internal consistency (0.82) and inter-rater reliability (0.80-0.92) were high. Correlations between the BIIP and NIPS were modest (r=0.64, p<0.01) as were correlations between the BIIP and mean heart rate (r=0.45, p<0.01). In this initial study, the BIIP has been shown to be a reliable, valid scale for assessing acute pain in preterm infants in the NICU.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP) scoring sheet.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in mean Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain (BIIP) scores across phases of blood collection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Als H. Manual for the naturalistic observation of newborn behavior (preterm and fullterm) Boston: The Children’s Hospital; 1984.
    1. Ambuel B, Hamlett KW, Marx CM, Blumer JL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992;17:95–109. - PubMed
    1. Anand KJS, Aranda JV, Berde CB, Buckman A, Caparelli EV, Carlo WA, Hummel P, Lantos J, Johnston CC, Lehr VT, Lynn AM, Maxwell LG, Oberlander TF, Raju TNK, Soriano SG, Tadio, Walco GA. Analgesia and anesthesia for neonates: study design and ethical issues. Clin Ther. 2005;27:814–843. - PubMed
    1. Barr R. Reflections on measuring pain in infants: dissociation in responsive systems and “honest signalling”. Arch Dis Child. 1998;79:F152–F156. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger RD, Saul P, Cohen RJ. Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation: canine atrial rate response. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H142–H152. - PubMed

Publication types