Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;32(4):264-272.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.011.

Trends in black-white differentials in dietary intakes of U.S. adults, 1971-2002

Ashima K Kant  1 , Barry I Graubard, Shiriki K Kumanyika
Affiliations

Trends in black-white differentials in dietary intakes of U.S. adults, 1971-2002

Ashima K Kant et al. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Disparities in the health status of blacks and whites have persisted despite considerable gains in improved health of the U.S. population. Tracking changes in black-white differentials in dietary attributes over time may help in understanding the contribution of diet to these disparities.

Methods: Data were used from four National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys conducted between 1971 and 2002 for trends in self-reported intakes of energy, macronutrients, micronutrients, fruits and vegetables, and the energy density of foods among U.S. non-Hispanic black (n=7099) and white (n=23,314) men and women aged 25 to 74 years. Logistic and linear regression methods were used to adjust for multiple covariates and survey design.

Results: Energy intake, amount of food, and carbohydrate energy increased, whereas percentage of energy from protein, fat, and saturated fat decreased over time in all race and gender groups (p<0.001). In whites and in black women, energy density increased (p<0.001) in parallel to increases in obesity prevalence. In all surveys, black men and women reported lower intakes of vegetables, potassium, and calcium (p<0.001) than their white counterparts. In men, the race differential in calcium intake increased across surveys (p=0.004).

Conclusions: Dietary intake trends in blacks and whites from 1971 to 2002 were similar, which suggests that previously identified dietary risk factors that differentially affect black Americans have not improved in a relative sense.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No financial conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Secular trends in the prevalence of obesity and mean energy density of foods and nutritive beverages among men and women (NHANES I, 1971–75 to NHANES 1999–2002).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multivariate-adjusted intakes of potassium (top row; mean intake), calcium (middle row; mean intake), and vegetables (bottom row; percent reporting any vegetable) for non-Hispanic white (solid line) and black (dotted line) adults by education and poverty level (all surveys combined). All education trends were significant for NH whites and blacks. Poverty level trends were significant for potassium and vegetable intake. All race differentials were significant for all categories of education and poverty.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health. 2. Washington, DC: US: Government Printing Office; 2000.
    1. National Center for Health Statistics. Health United States, 2005 With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville, Maryland: 2005. - PubMed
    1. LaVeist TA. Disentangling race and socioeconomic status: A key to understanding health inequalities. J Urban Health: Bull NY Acad Med. 2005;82:iii26–iii34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams DR. Race, socioeconomic status, and health. The added effects of racism and discrimination. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:173–88. - PubMed
    1. O'Malley CD, Le GM, Glaser SL, Shema SJ, West DW. Socioeconomic status and breast carcinoma survival in four racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer. 2003;97:1303–11. - PubMed

Publication types