Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;115(2):298-302.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.8835. Epub 2006 Nov 14.

Health effects of airborne exposures from concentrated animal feeding operations

Affiliations

Health effects of airborne exposures from concentrated animal feeding operations

Dick Heederik et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Toxic gases, vapors, and particles are emitted from concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) into the general environment. These include ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, malodorous vapors, and particles contaminated with a wide range of microorganisms. Little is known about the health risks of exposure to these agents for people living in the surrounding areas. Malodor is one of the predominant concerns, and there is evidence that psychophysiologic changes may occur as a result of exposure to malodorous compounds. There is a paucity of data regarding community adverse health effects related to low-level gas and particulate emissions. Most information comes from studies among workers in CAFO installations. Research over the last decades has shown that microbial exposures, especially endotoxin exposure, are related to deleterious respiratory health effects, of which cross-shift lung function decline and accelerated decline over time are the most pronounced effects. Studies in naïve subjects and workers have shown respiratory inflammatory responses related to the microbial load. This working group, which was part of the Conference on Environmental Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Anticipating Hazards-Searching for Solutions, concluded that there is a great need to evaluate health effects from exposures to the toxic gases, vapors, and particles emitted into the general environment by CAFOs. Research should focus not only on nuisance and odors but also on potential health effects from microbial exposures, concentrating on susceptible subgroups, especially asthmatic children and the elderly, since these exposures have been shown to be related to respiratory health effects among workers in CAFOs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Attwood P, Brouwer R, Ruigewaard P, Versloot P, de Wit R, Heederik D, et al. A study of the relationship between airborne contaminants and environmental factors in Dutch swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987;48(8):745–751. - PubMed
    1. Avery R, Wing S, Marshall S, Schiffman S. Odor from industrial hog farming operations and mucosal immune function in neighbors. Arch Environ Health. 2004;59(2):101–108. - PubMed
    1. Braun-Fahrländer C, Gassner M, Grize L, Neu U, Sennhauser FH, Varonier HS, et al. Prevalence of hay fever and allergic sensitization in farmer’s children and their peers living in the same rural community. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999;29:28–34. - PubMed
    1. Braun-Fahrländer CH, Riedler J, Herz U, Eder W, Waser M, Grize L, et al. Environmental exposure to endotoxin and its relation to asthma in school-age children. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(12):869–877. - PubMed
    1. Brouwer R, Heederik D, van Swieten P. IgG4 antibodies against pig-derived antigens. Am J Ind Med. 1990;17:96–98. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms