Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;115(2):308-12.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.8839. Epub 2006 Nov 14.

Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality

Affiliations

Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality

Joann Burkholder et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Waste from agricultural livestock operations has been a long-standing concern with respect to contamination of water resources, particularly in terms of nutrient pollution. However, the recent growth of concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) presents a greater risk to water quality because of both the increased volume of waste and to contaminants that may be present (e.g., antibiotics and other veterinary drugs) that may have both environmental and public health importance. Based on available data, generally accepted livestock waste management practices do not adequately or effectively protect water resources from contamination with excessive nutrients, microbial pathogens, and pharmaceuticals present in the waste. Impacts on surface water sources and wildlife have been documented in many agricultural areas in the United States. Potential impacts on human and environmental health from long-term inadvertent exposure to water contaminated with pharmaceuticals and other compounds are a growing public concern. This work-group, which is part of the Conference on Environmental Health Impacts of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: Anticipating Hazards--Searching for Solutions, identified needs for rigorous ecosystem monitoring in the vicinity of CAFOs and for improved characterization of major toxicants affecting the environment and human health. Last, there is a need to promote and enforce best practices to minimize inputs of nutrients and toxicants from CAFOs into freshwater and marine ecosystems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aneja VP, Nelson DR, Roelle PA, Walker JT. Agricultural ammonia emissions and ammonium concentrations associated with aerosols and precipitation in the southeast United States. J Geophys Res. 2003;108(D4):ACH12-1–12-11.
    1. Arbuckle TE, Sherman GJ, Corey PN, Walters D, Lo B. Water nitrates and CNS birth defects: a population-based case-control study. Arch Environ Health. 1988;43:162–167. - PubMed
    1. Barker JC, Zublena JP. 1995. Livestock Manure Nutrient Assessment in North Carolina. Final Report. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, North Carolina State University.
    1. Barnes KK, Christenson SC, Kolpin DW, Focazio MJ, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD, et al. Pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants within a leachate plume downgradient of a municipal landfill. Ground Water Monitoring Rev. 2004;24:119–126.
    1. Barrett JH, Parslow RC, McKinney PA, Law GR, Forman D. Nitrate in drinking water and the incidence of gastric, esophageal, and brain cancer in Yorkshire, England. Cancer Causes Control. 1998;9:153–159. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources