The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
- PMID: 17384894
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-007-0336-6
The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation of the uterus as a primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse. In this observational study, 133 women underwent a sacrospinous hysteropexy. Data were obtained from their medical records, and standardized questionnaires about urogenital symptoms and quality of life were used. All women were invited for gynecological examination, using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification score. Ninety-nine women responded by returning the questionnaire (mean age, 59.2 and follow-up time, 22.5 months); 60 of these women underwent gynecologic examination. Eighty-four percent of women were highly satisfied about the outcome of the procedure. Serious complications were rare. The recurrence rate of descensus uteri that needed surgical treatment was 2.3%. The recurrence of cystoceles after surgery was 35%, but there were no differences in urogenital symptoms between women with or without a cystocele.
Similar articles
-
Pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:204-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 4. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017. PMID: 28802943
-
Functional outcome after sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterine descensus.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Jun;19(6):747-52. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0520-8. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008. PMID: 18297228 Free PMC article.
-
Sacrospinous hysteropexy compared to vaginal hysterectomy as primary surgical treatment for a descensus uteri: effects on urinary symptoms.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Nov;14(5):350-5; discussion 355. doi: 10.1007/s00192-003-1084-x. Epub 2003 Sep 23. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003. PMID: 14618315
-
Native tissue sacrospinous hysteropexy from an anterior approach.Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1591-1593. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04601-0. Epub 2020 Nov 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2021. PMID: 33219824 Review.
-
Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Jul-Aug;15(4):286-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1166-4. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004. PMID: 15517676 Review.
Cited by
-
Analysis of risk factors associated with surgical failure of sacrospinous suspension for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Apr;20(4):387-91. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0780-y. Epub 2008 Dec 16. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009. PMID: 19083134
-
Patient's preference for sacrospinous hysteropexy or modified Manchester operation: A discrete choice experiment.BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):99-106. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17280. Epub 2022 Aug 31. BJOG. 2023. PMID: 36043332 Free PMC article.
-
Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Nat Rev Urol. 2010 Nov;7(11):626-33. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.164. Nat Rev Urol. 2010. PMID: 21068763 Review.
-
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with vaginal sacrospinous hysteropexy (LAVA-trial, study protocol).BMC Womens Health. 2014 Sep 17;14:112. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-112. BMC Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 25231240 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):581-587. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3832-y. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30515540
References
-
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Mar;188(3):645-50 - PubMed
-
- Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(2):97-104 - PubMed
-
- Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(6):381-4; discussion 384-5 - PubMed
-
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 - PubMed
-
- Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;177(6):1356-61; discussion 1361-2 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical