Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Mar;21(1):114-9.
doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.21.1.114.

Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Peer enhancement of a brief motivational intervention with mandated college students

Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw et al. Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

In this pilot study, the authors evaluated whether incorporating a peer in a brief motivational intervention would lead to significant reductions in alcohol use and problems in students mandated to receive treatment after violating campus alcohol policy. Thirty-six participant-peer dyads (66% male) were randomly assigned to receive either two 45-min sessions of an individual motivational intervention (IMI, n = 18) or a peer-enhanced motivational intervention (PMI, n = 18). The IMI included exploration of motivation to change alcohol use, perceived positive and negative effects of drinking, personalized feedback, and goals for changing alcohol consumption and related behaviors. The PMI included all elements of the IMI plus the presence of a supportive peer of the participant during both sessions. Although both groups significantly reduced number of drinking days and heavy drinking days at 1-month follow-up, the magnitude of within-group reductions in alcohol use and problems was 3 times larger on average for the PMI group than for the IMI group, based on effect-size calculations. Peers and participants endorsed high satisfaction ratings on the PMI. Findings indicate the promise of including peers in brief motivational interventions for mandated students.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arnold ME, Hughes JN. First do no harm: Adverse effects of grouping deviant youth for skills training. Journal of School Psychology. 1999;37:99–115.
    1. Bartholow BD, Sher KJ, Krull JL. Changes in heavy drinking over the third decade of life as a function of collegiate fraternity and sorority involvement: A prospective, multilevel analysis. Health Psychology. 2003;22:616–626. - PubMed
    1. Beattie MC, Longabaugh R, Elliott G, Stout RL, Fava J, Noel NE. Effect of the social environment on alcohol involvement and subjective well being prior to alcoholism treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1993;54:283–296. - PubMed
    1. Borsari BE, Carey KB. Understanding fraternity drinking: Five recurring themes in the literature, 1980–1998. Journal of American College Health. 1999;48:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Borsari B, Carey KB. Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse. 2001;13/14:391–424. - PubMed

Publication types