Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection
- PMID: 17387554
- PMCID: PMC3043851
- DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9034-7
Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection
Abstract
Despite the potential to dominate radiology reporting, current speech recognition technology is thus far a weak and inconsistent alternative to traditional human transcription. This is attributable to poor accuracy rates, in spite of vendor claims, and the wasted resources that go into correcting erroneous reports. A solution to this problem is post-speech-recognition error detection that will assist the radiologist in proofreading more efficiently. In this paper, we present a statistical method for error detection that can be applied after transcription. The results are encouraging, showing an error detection rate as high as 96% in some cases.
References
-
- Horii SC, Redfern R, Kundel H, et al. PACS technologies and reliability: are we making things better or worse? Proc SPIE. 2002;4685:16–24. doi: 10.1117/12.467007. - DOI
-
- Al-Aynati NM, Chorneyko KA. Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(6):721–725. - PubMed
-
- Marion J: Radiologists’ attitudes can make or break speech recognition. Diagn Imaging Online http://www.superiorconsultant.com/Pressroom/Articles/Diagnostic%20Imagin...
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
