Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007;19(1):1-12.
doi: 10.1071/rd06103.

Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors

Affiliations
Review

Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors

Qiang Wang et al. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007.

Abstract

Mounting evidence that oocyte quality profoundly affects fertilisation an d subsequent embryo development drives the continued search for reliable predictors of oocyte developmental competence. In the present review, we provide an overall summary and analysis of potential criteria that can be used to evaluate oocyte quality. These criteria are specifically classified as morphological and cellular/molecular predictors. Traditional methods for the evaluation of oocyte quality are based on morphological classification of thefollicle, cumulus-oocytecomplex, polar body and/or meiotic spindle. Although the use of morphological characteristics as predictors of oocyte quality is controversial, such a grading system can provide valuable information for the preselection of oocytes with higher developmental competence and, therefore, may maximise embryo developmental outcome. Several intrinsic markers (such as mitochondrial status and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 activity) and extrinsic markers (such as apoptosis of follicular cells and levels of the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily in follicular fluid or serum) have also been reported as useful indicators of oocyte competence and embryo quality. Compared with the morphological parameters, these cellular and molecular predictors of oocyte quality may prove to be more precise and objective, although further studies and refinement of techniques are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources