The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT
- PMID: 1738990
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.3.1738990
The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to determine the frequency of detection of small hepatic lesions (less than or equal to 15 mm) in outpatients who had abdominal CT and to assess the significance of these lesions in the presence or absence of known malignant tumors. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans in 1454 patients were reviewed. In 254 patients (17%), hepatic lesions 15 mm or smaller were detected. In 51% of these patients, lesions were judged benign on the basis of other imaging studies, biopsy results, or stability for at least 6 months as shown by CT. Lesions were judged malignant on the basis of progression seen on radiologic studies or biopsy in 22%. The other 27% of the patients had lesions that could not be classified. The majority of patients with small hepatic lesions (82%) were known to have a malignant tumor; in 51% of these patients, lesions were diagnosed as benign. No patient without a known malignant tumor had a small hepatic lesion that was determined to be malignant. Multiple small lesions were more likely to represent malignant disease than were single small lesions. We conclude that small hepatic lesions are common (seen in 17% of our patients), and that there is a high probability that hepatic lesions smaller than 15 mm are benign, even in patients known to have an extrahepatic malignant tumor.
Similar articles
-
Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Apr;164(4):879-84. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.4.7726040. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995. PMID: 7726040
-
Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer.Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):71-4. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja0371. Radiology. 1999. PMID: 9885589
-
[Incidence and significance of small focal liver lesions in MRI].Rofo. 2001 May;173(5):424-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13340. Rofo. 2001. PMID: 11414150 German.
-
The Rocky liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation of calcified hepatic masses.Radiographics. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):675-85; quiz 726. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599391. Radiographics. 1998. PMID: 9599391 Review.
-
Typical and atypical benign liver lesions: A review.Clin Imaging. 2017 Jul-Aug;44:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 4. Clin Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28486156 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Eur Radiol. 2006 Jun;16(6):1337-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0140-y. Epub 2006 Feb 2. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 16453115
-
Imaging of liver metastases with contrast-specific low-MI real-time ultrasound and SonoVue.Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13 Suppl 3:N79-86. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-0012-2. Eur Radiol. 2003. PMID: 15015886 Review. No abstract available.
-
Focal malignant liver lesions: diagnosis by dynamic incremental CT, early phase.Eur Radiol. 1996;6(4):433-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00182460. Eur Radiol. 1996. PMID: 8798017
-
Spectrum of liver lesions hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase: an approach by clinical setting.Insights Imaging. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-00928-w. Insights Imaging. 2021. PMID: 33432491 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in the assessment of hepatic metastases: A review.World J Hepatol. 2010 Jan 27;2(1):8-15. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v2.i1.8. World J Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 21160951 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical