Psychosocial factors and their predictive value in chiropractic patients with low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study
- PMID: 17394652
- PMCID: PMC1852566
- DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-5
Psychosocial factors and their predictive value in chiropractic patients with low back pain: a prospective inception cohort study
Abstract
Background: Being able to estimate the likelihood of poor recovery from episodes of back pain is important for care. Studies of psychosocial factors in inception cohorts in general practice and occupational populations have begun to make inroads to these problems. However, no studies have yet investigated this in chiropractic patients.
Methods: A prospective inception cohort study of patients presenting to a UK chiropractic practice for new episodes of non-specific low back pain (LBP) was conducted. Baseline questionnaires asked about age, gender, occupation, work status, duration of current episode, chronicity, aggravating features and bothersomeness using Deyo's 'Core Set'. Psychological factors (fear-avoidance beliefs, inevitability, anxiety/distress and coping, and co-morbidity were also assessed at baseline. Satisfaction with care, number of attendances and pain impact were determined at 6 weeks. Predictors of poor outcome were sought by the calculation of relative risk ratios.
Results: Most patients presented within 4 weeks of onset. Of 158 eligible and willing patients, 130 completed both baseline and 6-week follow-up questionnaires. Greatest improvements at 6 weeks were in interference with normal work (ES 1.12) and LBP bothersomeness (ES 1.37). Although most patients began with moderate-high back pain bothersomeness scores, few had high psychometric ones. Co-morbidity was a risk for high-moderate interference with normal work at 6 weeks (RR 2.37; 95% C.I. 1.15-4.74). An episode duration of >4 weeks was associated with moderate to high bothersomeness at 6 weeks (RR 2.07; 95% C.I. 1.19-3.38) and negative outlook (inevitability) with moderate to high interference with normal work (RR 2.56; 95% C.I. 1.08-5.08).
Conclusion: Patients attending a private UK chiropractic clinic for new episodes of non-specific LBP exhibited few psychosocial predictors of poor outcome, unlike other patient populations that have been studied. Despite considerable bothersomeness at baseline, scores were low at follow-up. In this independent health sector back pain population, general health and duration of episode before consulting appeared more important to outcome than psychosocial factors.
Similar articles
-
Discographic, MRI and psychosocial determinants of low back pain disability and remission: a prospective study in subjects with benign persistent back pain.Spine J. 2005 Jan-Feb;5(1):24-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.250. Spine J. 2005. PMID: 15653082
-
Predictors of short-term work-related disability among active duty US Navy personnel: a cohort study in patients with acute and subacute low back pain.Spine J. 2012 Sep;12(9):806-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Jan 9. Spine J. 2012. PMID: 22227177
-
Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):586-92. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17334295
-
The STarT back tool in chiropractic practice: a narrative review.Chiropr Man Therap. 2017 Apr 21;25:11. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0142-2. eCollection 2017. Chiropr Man Therap. 2017. PMID: 28439405 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors Associated With Pain Medication Use and the Relationship to Chiropractic Treatment Outcomes for Patients With Low Back and Neck Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022 Oct;45(8):575-585. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Jun 14. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2022. PMID: 37318388 Review.
Cited by
-
Do psychological and behavioral factors classified by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (Swedish version) predict the early clinical course of low back pain in patients receiving chiropractic care?BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 12;17:75. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0933-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 26867930 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predicting who responds to spinal manipulative therapy using a short-time frame methodology: Results from a 238-participant study.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 24;15(11):e0242831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242831. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33232379 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors for perceived recovery or functional improvement in non-specific low back pain: secondary analyses of three randomized clinical trials.Eur Spine J. 2010 Apr;19(4):650-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1254-8. Epub 2009 Dec 25. Eur Spine J. 2010. PMID: 20035358 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predictive performance of the STarT Back tool for poor outcomes in patients with low back pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 10;13(8):e069818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069818. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37562930 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Jun 12;20(1):17. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-17. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012. PMID: 22691623 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pincus T, Vogel S, Santos R, Breen A, Foster N, Underwood M. Attitudes to back pain amongst musculoskeletal practitioners: A comparison of professional groups and practice settings using the ABS-mp. Man Ther - PubMed
-
- Pedersen P. A survey of chiropractic practice in Europe. Eur J Chiropractic. 1994;42:3–28.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous