Individual, family, and neighborhood factors distinguish resilient from non-resilient maltreated children: a cumulative stressors model
- PMID: 17395260
- PMCID: PMC1978062
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.03.011
Individual, family, and neighborhood factors distinguish resilient from non-resilient maltreated children: a cumulative stressors model
Abstract
Objective: Children who are physically maltreated are at risk of a range of adverse outcomes in childhood and adulthood, but some children who are maltreated manage to function well despite their history of adversity. Which individual, family, and neighborhood characteristics distinguish resilient from non-resilient maltreated children? Do children's individual strengths promote resilience even when children are exposed to multiple family and neighborhood stressors (cumulative stressors model)?
Methods: Data were from the Environmental Risk Longitudinal Study which describes a nationally representative sample of 1,116 twin pairs and their families. Families were home-visited when the twins were 5 and 7 years old, and teachers provided information about children's behavior at school. Interviewers rated the likelihood that children had been maltreated based on mothers' reports of harm to the child and child welfare involvement with the family.
Results: Resilient children were those who engaged in normative levels of antisocial behavior despite having been maltreated. Boys (but not girls) who had above-average intelligence and whose parents had relatively few symptoms of antisocial personality were more likely to be resilient versus non-resilient to maltreatment. Children whose parents had substance use problems and who lived in relatively high crime neighborhoods that were low on social cohesion and informal social control were less likely to be resilient versus non-resilient to maltreatment. Consistent with a cumulative stressors model of children's adaptation, individual strengths distinguished resilient from non-resilient children under conditions of low, but not high, family and neighborhood stress.
Conclusion: These findings suggest that for children residing in multi-problem families, personal resources may not be sufficient to promote their adaptive functioning.
Figures
Comment in
-
Resilience, competence, and coping.Child Abuse Negl. 2007 Mar;31(3):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.001. Epub 2007 Apr 3. Child Abuse Negl. 2007. PMID: 17408738 No abstract available.
References
-
- Achenbach TM. Manual for the Teacher's Report Form and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1991.
-
- Achenbach TM. Manual for the Young Adult Self-Report and Young Adult Behavior Checklist. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry; 1997.
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual. 4. Washington DC: Authors; 1994.
-
- Appel AE, Holden GW. The co-occurrence of spouse and physical child abuse: A review and appraisal. Journal of Family Psychology. 1998;12:578–599.
-
- Bennett N, Jarvis L, Rowlands O, Singleton N, Haselden L. Living in Britain: Results from the General Household Survey. London: HMSO; 1996.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
