Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Winter;9(1):28-32.

Is the testis a chemo-privileged site? Is there a blood-testis barrier?

Affiliations

Is the testis a chemo-privileged site? Is there a blood-testis barrier?

Dhiren S Dave et al. Rev Urol. 2007 Winter.

Abstract

The incidence of testicular cancer, primarily seminoma, has been increasing in many countries, including the United States. The testis is often the site of residual cancer after adequate treatment with systemic chemotherapy. The blood-testis barrier is commonly cited as the explanation for residual tumor within the gonad after chemotherapy and as the indication for delayed orchiectomy. Conversely, complete eradication of viable tumor from the primary site is common and argues against the testis as a "tumor sanctuary." Residual tumor is also demonstrated within metastatic foci, and the disparity between the histopathologic response of the primary tumor and metastatic sites may be best explained by tumor heterogeneity and multiple tumor clones. Regardless of the scientific and academic arguments, delayed radical orchiectomy remains an important part of treatment for patients undergoing primary chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:106–130. - PubMed
    1. Simmonds PD, Mead GM, Lee AH, et al. Orchiectomy after chemotherapy in patients with metastatic testicular cancer. Is it indicated? Cancer. 1995;75:1018–1024. - PubMed
    1. Chessells JM, Richards SM, Bailey CC, et al. Gender and treatment outcome in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: report from the MRC UKALL trials. Br J Haematol. 1995;89:364–372. - PubMed
    1. Lanning M, Garwicz S, Hertz H, et al. Superior treatment results in females with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:66–68. - PubMed
    1. Sather H, Miller D, Nesbit M, et al. Differences in prognosis for boys and girls with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. 1981;1:739–743. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources