Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;33(4):591-602.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.12.014.

Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus

Affiliations

Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus

Noel Alpins et al. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the outcomes of photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using corneal and refractive parameters for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus.

Setting: Private practice, Melbourne, Australia.

Methods: Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy was performed with a Star 1 or Star 2 laser (Visx) in 45 eyes with forme fruste or mild keratoconus using the Alpins vector planning technique. Inclusion requirements were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/40 or better, no slitlamp signs of keratoconus, mean keratometry less than 50.00 diopters (D), and corneal and refractive stability for at least 2 years.

Results: Thirty-two eyes had follow-up of 5 years and 9 eyes, of 10 years. Preoperatively, the mean refractive astigmatism was -1.39 DC +/- 1.08 (SD) (range 0.45 to -5.04 DC) and the mean corneal astigmatism was 1.52 +/- 1.18 D (range 0.35 to 4.75 D) by manual keratometry and 1.70 +/- 1.42 D (range 0.32 to 5.32 D) by topography. Twelve months postoperatively, the mean refractive astigmatism was -0.43 +/- 0.40 D and the mean corneal astigmatism was 1.05 +/- 0.85 D by keratometry and 1.02 +/- 0.83 D by topography. At 12 months, the uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 56% of eyes and 20/40 or better in all eyes. The BCVA was 20/20 or better in 89% of eyes and 20/30 or better in all eyes. Seven eyes had a loss of BCVA, and 16 eyes had a gain. There were no cases of keratoconus progression.

Conclusions: Photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus was safe and effective for myopia and astigmatism in carefully selected patients with refractive and corneal stability. The incorporation of the corneal astigmatism data into the applied treatment parameters may improve visual and total astigmatism results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by