Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer
- PMID: 17400596
- PMCID: PMC2095719
- DOI: 10.1136/gut.2007.120709
Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer
Abstract
Background: Colonoscopy is one of the methods of choice for screening relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.
Objective: To evaluate the rate of adherence to colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer and describe the lesions found.
Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study was conducted. The study population was composed of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer selected randomly from the EPICOLON study. Seventy-four index patients were included. These had 342 living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and children), of whom 281 were interviewed.
Results: The adherence rate was 38% (107/281). Adherence was greater in families with a higher degree of familial aggregation for colorectal cancer (88.9% for Amsterdam vs 33.3% for Bethesda and sporadic cancer; p<0.05), an index patient aged under 65 years (60% for patients <65 years vs 32.9% for patients >or=65 years; p<0.05) and an index patient who was female (46.2% for women vs 31% for men; p = 0.28). Adherence was also greater in relatives under 65 years (54% in patients <65 years vs 18% in patients >or=65 years; p = 0.05), in female relatives (49% in female relatives vs 27.3% in male relatives; p<0.05) and in siblings and children (40% in siblings and children vs 13% in parents; p<0.05). Lesions were found in 26% (28/107) of the study population. Nine (8.4%) individuals had a total of 18 advanced lesions.
Conclusions: These results indicate that adherence to colonoscopy in our population of first-degree relatives was low. The adherence was more frequently associated with a higher degree of familial aggregation, a relative age of under 65 years, a sibling or offspring relationship, and female sex.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None.
Comment in
-
When even people at high risk do not take up colorectal cancer screening.Gut. 2007 Dec;56(12):1648-50. doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.125823. Gut. 2007. PMID: 17998319 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo La situación del cáncer en España. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Madrid 2005
-
- Smith R A, Cokkinides V, Eyre H J. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clinic 20045441–52. - PubMed
-
- United States Preventive Services Task Force Summaries for patients. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002137138 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical