Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Dec;56(12):1714-8.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2007.120709. Epub 2007 Mar 30.

Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer

Luis Bujanda et al. Gut. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Colonoscopy is one of the methods of choice for screening relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.

Objective: To evaluate the rate of adherence to colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer and describe the lesions found.

Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study was conducted. The study population was composed of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer selected randomly from the EPICOLON study. Seventy-four index patients were included. These had 342 living first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and children), of whom 281 were interviewed.

Results: The adherence rate was 38% (107/281). Adherence was greater in families with a higher degree of familial aggregation for colorectal cancer (88.9% for Amsterdam vs 33.3% for Bethesda and sporadic cancer; p<0.05), an index patient aged under 65 years (60% for patients <65 years vs 32.9% for patients >or=65 years; p<0.05) and an index patient who was female (46.2% for women vs 31% for men; p = 0.28). Adherence was also greater in relatives under 65 years (54% in patients <65 years vs 18% in patients >or=65 years; p = 0.05), in female relatives (49% in female relatives vs 27.3% in male relatives; p<0.05) and in siblings and children (40% in siblings and children vs 13% in parents; p<0.05). Lesions were found in 26% (28/107) of the study population. Nine (8.4%) individuals had a total of 18 advanced lesions.

Conclusions: These results indicate that adherence to colonoscopy in our population of first-degree relatives was low. The adherence was more frequently associated with a higher degree of familial aggregation, a relative age of under 65 years, a sibling or offspring relationship, and female sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Comment in

References

    1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo La situación del cáncer en España. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. Madrid 2005
    1. Castells A, Marzo M, Bellas B.et al Guía de práctica clínica en prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Gastroenterol Hepatol 200427573–634. - PubMed
    1. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D.et al Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale—update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003123544–560. - PubMed
    1. Smith R A, Cokkinides V, Eyre H J. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clinic 20045441–52. - PubMed
    1. United States Preventive Services Task Force Summaries for patients. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002137138 - PubMed

Publication types