Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;16(2):101-6.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.017426.

Effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on smokers' anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours

Alison B Albers  1 , Michael Siegel, Debbie M Cheng, Lois Biener, Nancy A Rigotti
Affiliations

Effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on smokers' anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours

Alison B Albers et al. Tob Control. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours among adult smokers.

Design: Hierarchical linear modelling (HLM) was used to assess the relationship between baseline strength of town-level restaurant smoking regulation and follow-up (1) perceptions of the social acceptability of smoking and (2) quitting behaviours.

Setting: Each of the 351 Massachusetts towns was classified as having strong (complete smoking ban) or weak (all other and no smoking restrictions) restaurant smoking regulations.

Subjects: 1712 adult smokers of Massachusetts aged > or = 18 years at baseline who were interviewed via random-digit-dial telephone survey in 2001-2 and followed up 2 years later.

Main outcome measures: Perceived social acceptability of smoking in restaurants and bars, and making a quit attempt and quitting smoking.

Results: Among adult smokers who had made a quit attempt at baseline, living in a town with a strong regulation was associated with a threefold increase in the odds of making a quit attempt at follow-up (OR = 3.12; 95% CI 1.51 to 6.44). Regulation was found to have no effect on cessation at follow-up. A notable, although marginal, effect of regulation was observed for perceiving smoking in bars as socially unacceptable only among smokers who reported at baseline that smoking in bars was socially unacceptable.

Conclusions: Although local restaurant smoking regulations did not increase smoking cessation rates, they did increase the likelihood of making a quit attempt among smokers who had previously tried to quit, and seem to reinforce anti-social smoking norms among smokers who already viewed smoking in bars as socially unacceptable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Health effects of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the report of the California Environmental Protection Agency. Smoking and tobacco control monograph 10. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1999
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer Involuntary smoking: summary of data reported and evaluation Lyon, France: IARC 2002
    1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment Respiratory health effects of passive smoking: lung cancer and other disorders Washington, DC: US EPA, 1992, EPA publication 600/6‐90/006F
    1. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation Municipalities with local 100% smokefree laws: cumulative number effective by year 1990–2004. Berkeley, CA: American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, 2004, http://www.no‐smoke.org/100ordgraph.pdf
    1. American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation States and municipalities with local 100% smokefree laws in workplaces, restaurants or bars: currently in effect as of April 17, 2006. Berkeley, CA: American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation, 2006, http://www.no‐smoke.org/pdf/100ordlist.pdf (accessed 13 Feb 2007)

Publication types