Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Apr;16(2):84-9.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019885.

Making use of mortality data to improve quality and safety in general practice: a review of current approaches

Affiliations
Review

Making use of mortality data to improve quality and safety in general practice: a review of current approaches

Richard Baker et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To review studies of the use of mortality data in quality and safety improvement in general practice.

Design: Narrative review.

Methods: Search of Medline, Embase and CINAHL for articles reporting mortality monitoring or mortality reviews in general practice. The included articles were reported in English and of any study design, excluding case reports and comment pieces. Studies of palliative care and bereavement, and of primary care programmes in developing countries, were excluded.

Results: 229 articles were identified in the searches, 65 were identified as potentially relevant and 53 were included in the review. The studies addressed the impact of primary care provision on mortality rates, methods of monitoring mortality, and the role of audit and death registers in quality and safety improvement. General practitioners were interested in using mortality data but reported difficulties in obtaining complete information. There were no experimental studies of the impact of the use of mortality data, and little evidence of long-term systematic initiatives to use mortality data in quality and safety improvement in general practice.

Conclusions: Mortality data are not used systematically in general practice although general practitioners appear interested in the potential of this information in improving quality and safety. Improved systems to provide complete data are needed and experimental studies required to determine the effectiveness of use of the data to improve general practice care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker R.Harold Shipman's clinical practice, 1974–1998. London: HMSO, 2001
    1. The Shipman Inquiry Death disguised. First report, volume 1. Manchester: The Shipman Inquiry, 2002
    1. The Shipman Inquiry Safeguarding patients: lessons from the past—proposals for the future. Fifth Report. Cm 6249. London: HMSO, 2004
    1. Guthrie B. Can mortality monitoring in general practice be made to work? BJGP 200555660–661. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi L. The relationship between primary care and life chances. J Health Care Poor Underserved 19923321–335. - PubMed

Publication types