Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;16(2):132-4.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020073.

Using trigger phrases to detect adverse drug reactions in ambulatory care notes

Affiliations

Using trigger phrases to detect adverse drug reactions in ambulatory care notes

Michael N Cantor et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: As medical care moves towards an outpatient focus, monitoring systems for ambulatory patients are increasingly important. Because adverse outcomes due to medications are an important problem in outpatients, the authors developed an automated monitoring system for detecting adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in ambulatory patients.

Methods: The authors obtained a set of approximately 110,000 ambulatory care notes from the medicine clinic at Bellevue Hospital Centre for 2003-4, and manually analysed a representative sample of 1250 notes to obtain a gold standard. To detect ADRs in the text of electronic ambulatory notes, the authors used a "trigger phrases" methodology, based on a simple grammar populated with a limited set of keywords.

Results: Under current functionality, this system detected 38 of 54 cases in the authors' gold standard set, of which 17 were true positives, for a sensitivity of 31%, a specificity of 98%, and a positive predictive value of 45%. Their proxy measure correlated with 70% of the ADRs in the gold standard. These values are comparable or superior to other systems described in the literature.

Conclusions: These results show that an automated system can detect ADRs with moderate sensitivity and high specificity, and has the potential to serve as the basis for a larger scale reporting system.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. WHO Safety of medicines. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_EDM_QSM_2002.2.pdf (accessed November 2005)
    1. Hanlon J T, Maher R L, Lindblad C I.et al Comparison of methods for detecting potential adverse drug events in frail elderly inpatients and outpatients. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2001581622–1626. - PubMed
    1. Naranjo C A, Shear N H, Lanctot K L. Advances in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. J Clin Pharmacol 199232897–904. - PubMed
    1. Camargo A L, Cardoso Ferreira M B, Heineck I. Adverse drug reactions: a cohort study in internal medicine units at a university hospital. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 200662143–149. - PubMed
    1. van der Hooft C S, Sturkenboom M C, van Grootheest K.et al Adverse drug reaction‐related hospitalisations: a nationwide study in The Netherlands. Drug Saf 200629161–168. - PubMed

Publication types