Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-9.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019711.

Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery

A N Healey  1 , C P Primus, M Koutantji
Affiliations

Quantifying distraction and interruption in urological surgery

A N Healey et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

Background: To enhance safety in surgery, it is necessary to develop a variety of tools for measuring and evaluating the system of work. One important consideration for safety in any high-risk work is the frequency and effect of distraction and interruption.

Aim: To quantify distraction and interruption to the sterile surgical team in urology.

Methods: Observation of the behaviour of the surgical team and their task activity determined distraction and interruption recorded. Using an ordinal scale, an observer rated each salient distraction or interruption observed in relation to the team's involvement.

Results: The frequency of events and their attached ratings were high, deriving from varying degrees of equipment, procedure and environment problems, telephones, bleepers and conversations.

Discussion: With further refinement and testing, this method may be useful for distinguishing ordinal levels of work interference in surgery and helpful in raising awareness of its origin for postoperative surgical team debriefing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. Etchells E, O'Neil C, Bernstein M. Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention. World J Surg 200327936–942. - PubMed
    1. Calland J, Guerlain S, Adams R.et al A systems approach to surgical safety. Surg Endosc 2002161005–1014. - PubMed
    1. Vincent C, Moorthy K, Sarker S K.et al Systems approach to surgical quality and safety: from concepts to measurements Ann Surg2004239475–482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chilton C. Patient safety and surgery. BJU Int 20044463–464. - PubMed
    1. Weinger M B, Englund C E. Ergonomic and human factors affecting anesthetic vigilance and monitoring performance in the operating room environment. Anesthesiology 199073995–1021. - PubMed