Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Apr 9;177(1):29-37.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.200611079. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

Dolichol-linked oligosaccharide selection by the oligosaccharyltransferase in protist and fungal organisms

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dolichol-linked oligosaccharide selection by the oligosaccharyltransferase in protist and fungal organisms

Daniel J Kelleher et al. J Cell Biol. .

Abstract

The dolichol-linked oligosaccharide Glc3Man9GlcNAc2-PP-Dol is the in vivo donor substrate synthesized by most eukaryotes for asparagine-linked glycosylation. However, many protist organisms assemble dolichol-linked oligosaccharides that lack glucose residues. We have compared donor substrate utilization by the oligosaccharyltransferase (OST) from Trypanosoma cruzi, Entamoeba histolytica, Trichomonas vaginalis, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae using structurally homogeneous dolichol-linked oligosaccharides as well as a heterogeneous dolichol-linked oligosaccharide library. Our results demonstrate that the OST from diverse organisms utilizes the in vivo oligo saccharide donor in preference to certain larger and/or smaller oligosaccharide donors. Steady-state enzyme kinetic experiments reveal that the binding affinity of the tripeptide acceptor for the protist OST complex is influenced by the structure of the oligosaccharide donor. This rudimentary donor substrate selection mechanism has been refined in fungi and vertebrate organisms by the addition of a second, regulatory dolichol-linked oligosaccharide binding site, the presence of which correlates with acquisition of the SWP1/ribophorin II subunit of the OST complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
OS-PP-Dol donors and predicted subunit compositions of the OST from selected eukaryotes. The left portion of A–D shows the oligosaccharide structure of the in vivo donor for N-linked glycosylation. N-acetylglucosamine residues are designated by squares, mannose residues are shown as circles, and glucose residues are shown as triangles. Red saccharides are transferred by cytoplasmically oriented ALG gene products, and blue residues are transferred by luminally oriented ALG gene products. The right section of each panel shows the predicted (A, T. cruzi; B, C. neoformans; or C, T. vaginalis and E. histolytica) or experimentally determined (D, S. cerevisiae) composition of the OST complex. The color code of the subunits (red, green, and blue) designates subcomplexes detected in higher eukaryotes (Karaoglu et al., 1997; Spirig et al., 1997). The yellow bar designates the ER membrane.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Donor substrate selection from an OS-PP-Dol library. The purified yeast OST (A) or detergent extracts prepared from T. cruzi (B), T. vaginalis (C), C. neoformans (D), or E. histolytica (not depicted) membranes were assayed for OST activity in the presence of glucosidase and mannosidase inhibitors using 1.2 μM OS-PP-Dol and 10 μM tripeptide acceptor (Nα-Ac-N-[125I]-Y-T NH2). Glycopeptide products ranging in size between M3GN2-NYT (M3) and G3M9GN2-NYT (G3) were resolved by HPLC and identified by migration relative to authentic standards (M5, M9, and G3). (E and F) The normalized initial transfer rate (OS-NYT/OS-PP-Dol) for the eight most abundant OS-PP-Dol donors was calculated by dividing the composition of the glycopeptide products by the composition of the OS-PP-Dol donor library. The OST from all organisms was assayed twice to determine the composition of the product pool. The composition of the donor pool was determined by duplicate assays (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/full/jcb.200611079/DC1). Note the difference in ordinate scales for E and F.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Reduced transfer of biosynthetic M5GN2-PP-Dol by the T. cruzi OST. (A) Biosynthetic M5GN2-PP-Dol (b) and M5GN2-PP-Dol isomers (c–i) produced by mannosidase digestion of M9GN2-PP-Dol (a). GlcNAc residues are indicated by squares, α-1,2–linked mannose residues are indicated by red circles, and α-1,3– and α-1,6–linked mannose residues are indicated by open circles. (B) Glycopeptide products obtained in an OST endpoint assay (>95% conversion of OS-PP-Dol to OS-NYT) were resolved by preparative HPLC to isolate the M5GN2-NYT glycopeptide (left). HPLC resolution of the α-1,2 mannosidase digestion products derived from M5GN2-NYT (right). The M3GN2-NYT (M3) peak is derived from isomer b, the M4GN2-NYT (M4) peak is derived from isomers c–h, and the M5GN2-NYT (M5) peak corresponds to isomer i. (C) HPLC profiles of α-1,2 mannosidase digestion products derived from M5GN2-NYT synthesized by the E. histolytica and T. cruzi OST. Redigestion of the M4 peak with a-1,2 mannosidase did not yield smaller products (not depicted); hence, the initial digestion had gone to completion. (D) The distribution of the three isomer classes (2, 1, or 0 α-1,2–linked mannose residues) was calculated for the total M5GN2-PP-Dol pool (OS) and for M5GN2-NYT synthesized by the S. cerevisiae (Sc), T. cruzi (Tc), E. histolytica (Eh), and T. vaginalis (Tv) OST. Values for the OS, Sc, and Tc are means of two independent experiments; error bars designate one of two independent data points. The OS values are derived from two replicates of B.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Oligosaccharide donor competition assays. OST activity was assayed using a constant concentration of the acceptor tripeptide (5 μM in A, B, and F and 10 μM in C–E). (A) Glycopeptide products from assays of the T. vaginalis (a and c) or S. cerevisiae (b) OST using 1 μM G3M9GN2-PP-Dol (a) or 0.6 μM G3M9GN2-PP-Dol plus 1.5 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol (b and c) were resolved by HPLC. For clarity, column profiles have been offset on the vertical axis. (B) The T. vaginalis (squares) or S. cerevisiae (circles) OST were assayed using 1.5 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol and increasing concentrations of G3M9GN2-PP-Dol. Glycopeptide products were resolved by HPLC to determine the percentage of M5GN2-NYT. The dashed line indicates the composition (in percentage of M5GN2-PP-Dol) of the donor substrate mixtures. (C–E) Purified S. cerevisiae (Sc) or detergent extracts of C. neoformans (Cn), E. histolytica (Eh), T. vaginalis (Tv), or T. cruzi (Tc) membranes were assayed using the following donor substrate mixtures: 1 μM G3M9GN2-PP-Dol + 1 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol (C), 1 μM G3M9GN2-PP-Dol + 1 μM M9GN2-PP-Dol (D), and 1 μM M9GN2-PP-Dol + 1 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol (E). Glycopeptides were resolved by HPLC to determine product composition. (F) The S. cerevisiae and T. vaginalis OST were assayed using the following mixture: (G2M9GN2-PP-Dol/G1M9GN2-PP-Dol/M9GN2-PP-Dol/M5GN2-PP-Dol, 35:6:2:57). Glycopeptides were resolved by HPLC (top). The M5GN2-NYT (M5), G1M9GN2-NYT (G1), and G2M9GN2-NYT (G2) peaks are labeled. The T. vaginalis OST (closed bars), but not the yeast OST (open bars), shows reduced utilization of G2M9GN2-PP-Dol and G1M9GN2-PP-Dol relative to M5GN2-PP-Dol (bottom).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Kinetic parameters for the oligosaccharide donor substrate. OST activity was assayed using a constant concentration of the acceptor tripeptide substrate (10 μM in A, B, and D and 15 μM in C) and variable concentrations of M5GN2-PP-Dol (A–C) or M9GN2-PP-Dol (D). (A, C, and D) Lineweaver-Burk plots (1/OST activity versus 1/[OS-PP-Dol]) for the T. vaginalis (A; Km = 0.22 μM), E. histolytica (C; Km = 0.72 μM), or T. cruzi (D; Km = 0.49 μM) OST were linear. (B) An Eadie-Hofstee plot (OST activity vs. OST activity/[OS-PP-Dol]) for the T. vaginalis (Km = 0.19 μM) OST was linear. The inset shows an Eadie-Hofstee plot for the S. cerevisiae OST using M5GN2-PP-Dol as the donor substrate.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Kinetic parameters for the tripeptide acceptor substrate. OST activity was assayed using a constant concentration of the OS-PP-Dol donor (1 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol or G3M9GN2-PP-Dol in A and 0.8 μM M5GN2-PP-Dol or M9GN2-PP-Dol in B) and increasing concentrations of acceptor tripeptide substrate. (A) Lineweaver-Burk plots for the T. vaginalis OST yielded apparent Km values of 17 μM (M5GN2-PP-Dol donor) and 53 μM (G3M9GN2-PP-Dol) for the acceptor tripeptide. (B) Lineweaver-Burk plots for the T. cruzi OST yielded apparent Km values of 2.3 μM (M9GN2-PP-Dol donor) and 6.9 μM (M5GN2-PP-Dol) for the acceptor tripeptide.

References

    1. Bause, E., W. Breuer, and S. Peters. 1995. Investigation of the active site of oligosaccharyltransferase from pig liver using synthetic tripeptides as tools. Biochem. J. 312:979–985. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosch, M., S. Trombetta, U. Engstrom, and A.J. Parodi. 1988. Characterization of dolichol diphosphate oligosaccharide: protein oligosaccharyltransferase and glycoprotein-processing glucosidases occurring in trypanosomatid protozoa. J. Biol. Chem. 263:17360–17365. - PubMed
    1. Breuer, W., and E. Bause. 1995. Oligosaccharyl transferase is a constitutive component of an oligomeric protein complex from pig liver endoplasmic reticulum. Eur. J. Biochem. 228:689–696. - PubMed
    1. Burda, P., and M. Aebi. 1999. The dolichol pathway of N-linked glycosylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1426:239–257. - PubMed
    1. Caramelo, J.J., O.A. Castro, L.G. Alonso, G. De Prat-Gay, and A.J. Parodi. 2003. UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase recognizes structured and solvent accessible hydrophobic patches in molten globule-like folding intermediates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:86–91. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms