Intensive dose-dense compared with high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk operable breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup study 9623
- PMID: 17404368
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9383
Intensive dose-dense compared with high-dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk operable breast cancer: Southwest Oncology Group/Intergroup study 9623
Abstract
Purpose: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)/Intergroup study 9623 was undertaken to compare treatment with an anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen followed by high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell support (AHPCS) with a modern dose-dense dose-escalated (nonstandard) regimen including both an anthracycline and a taxane.
Patients and methods: Participants in this phase III randomized study had operable breast cancer involving four or more axillary lymph nodes and had completed mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive four cycles of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by HDC with AHPCS or to receive sequential dose-dense and dose-escalated chemotherapy with doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide. The primary end point of this study was disease-free survival (DFS).
Results: Among 536 eligible patients, there was no significant difference between the two arms for DFS or overall survival (OS). Estimated five-year DFS was 80% (95% CI, 76% to 85%) for dose-dense therapy and 75% (95% CI, 69% to 80%) for transplantation. Estimated 5-year OS was 88% (95% CI, 84% to 92%) for dose-dense therapy and 84% (95% CI, 79% to 88%) for transplantation.
Conclusion: There is no evidence that transplantation was superior to dose-dense dose-escalated therapy. Transplantation was associated with an increase in toxicity and a possibly inferior outcome, although the hazard ratios were not significantly different from 1.
Comment in
-
Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk operable breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1642-4. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.9796. Epub 2007 Apr 2. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17404366 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- CA04919/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA04920/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA12644/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA13612/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA14028/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA16116/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA20319/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA21115/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA22433/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA25224/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA27057/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA32102/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35090/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35176/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35192/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35262/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35281/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA35996/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA37981/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA38926/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA42777/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA45377/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA45450/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA45560/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA45807/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA46113/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA46282/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA46368/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA46441/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA58415/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA58416/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA58658/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA58686/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA58861/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA63844/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA68183/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA76429/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA76447/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA76448/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA76462/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- CA77651/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
