Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Jan 29;362(1477):39-66.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1952.

The biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean benthos

Affiliations
Review

The biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean benthos

A Brandt et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Our knowledge of the biodiversity of the Southern Ocean (SO) deep benthos is scarce. In this review, we describe the general biodiversity patterns of meio-, macro- and megafaunal taxa, based on historical and recent expeditions, and against the background of the geological events and phylogenetic relationships that have influenced the biodiversity and evolution of the investigated taxa. The relationship of the fauna to environmental parameters, such as water depth, sediment type, food availability and carbonate solubility, as well as species interrelationships, probably have shaped present-day biodiversity patterns as much as evolution. However, different taxa exhibit different large-scale biodiversity and biogeographic patterns. Moreover, there is rarely any clear relationship of biodiversity pattern with depth, latitude or environmental parameters, such as sediment composition or grain size. Similarities and differences between the SO biodiversity and biodiversity of global oceans are outlined. The high percentage (often more than 90%) of new species in almost all taxa, as well as the high degree of endemism of many groups, may reflect undersampling of the area, and it is likely to decrease as more information is gathered about SO deep-sea biodiversity by future expeditions. Indeed, among certain taxa such as the Foraminifera, close links at the species level are already apparent between deep Weddell Sea faunas and those from similar depths in the North Atlantic and Arctic. With regard to the vertical zonation from the shelf edge into deep water, biodiversity patterns among some taxa in the SO might differ from those in other deep-sea areas, due to the deep Antarctic shelf and the evolution of eurybathy in many species, as well as to deep-water production that can fuel the SO deep sea with freshly produced organic matter derived not only from phytoplankton, but also from ice algae.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Locations of the ANDEEP expeditions. Diamonds, ANDEEP I (January to February 2002); triangles, ANDEEP II (February to April 2002); circles, ANDEEP III (January to April 2005).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram to show the evolution of deep-marine connections between the Weddell Sea region and the rest of the world's developing oceans as the Gondwana supercontinent broke up. Horizontal lines represent developing oceans through time, with side arrows indicating the initiation of links to other oceans and seas. The timing of events is in millions of years.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Average meiofauna densities versus depth, with symbols referring to the information source. Note that the data points from Gutzman et al. (2004) represent median densities, while other data points represent mean densities. (b) Average number of genera versus depth, with symbols referring to the information source.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Bathymetric distribution of amphipod scavengers. (b) Depth zonation exemplified on amphipod scavengers.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Number of species related to water depth (m). (a) Polychaeta, y=3.98−5.43×10−5x, R2=0.59; (b) Isopoda, y=1.93+9.87×10−5x−1.50×10−8x2, R2=0.21; and (c) Bivalvia, n.s. Solid circles, EASIZ cruises; open circles, ANDEEP cruises.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Most abundant Peracarida ordered by depth from ANDEEP I–III stations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allcock A.L, Collins M.A, Piatkowski U, Vecchione M. Thaumeledone and other deep water octopods from the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II. 2004;51:1883–1901. doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.07.019 - DOI
    1. Anderson J.B. Ecology and distribution of foraminifera in the Weddell Sea of Antarctica. Micropaleontology. 1975;21:69–96. doi:10.2307/1485156 - DOI
    1. Anderson J.B. Sediments. In: Glasby G.P, editor. Antarctic sector of the Pacific. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 1990. pp. 187–206.
    1. Andriashev A.P. A general review of the Antarctic bottom fish fauna. In: Kullander S.O, Fernholm B, editors. Proc. Vth Congress of European Ichthyologists. Swedish Museum of Natural History; Stockholm, Sweden: 1987. pp. 357–371.
    1. Arntz W.E, Brey T. The expedition ANTARKTIS XIX/5 (LAMPOS) of RV “Polarstern” in 2002. Ber. Polar. Meeresforsch. 2003;462:1–120.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources