Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa
- PMID: 17409209
- PMCID: PMC1933028
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02369-06
Agreement between self- and clinician-collected specimen results for detection and typing of high-risk human papillomavirus in specimens from women in Gugulethu, South Africa
Abstract
We assessed the agreement in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), as well as specific HPV types, between self- and clinician-obtained specimens for 450 women over 18 years of age attending a community health center in Gugulethu, South Africa. Both self-collected swabs and tampons had high agreement with clinician-obtained brushes when the Roche Reverse Line Blot Assay (RLBA) was used (for swabs, 86% concordance, with a kappa statistic [kappa] of 0.71; for tampons, 89% concordance, with kappa of 0.75). Agreement was lower, although still fair, with the Digene Hybrid Capture 2 test (HC2), with kappa higher for swabs than for tampons (for swabs, 81% concordance, with kappa of 0.61; for tampons, 82% concordance, with kappa of 0.55). Low-risk HPV types were nearly two times more common in self-collected specimens than in clinician-collected specimens tested by RLBA. All 15 women diagnosed with high-grade lesions by cytology tested positive for high-risk HPV with clinician-collected specimens tested by RLBA and HC2, while 11 out of 15 tested positive with self-collected specimens by HC2 and 5 out of 6 tested positive by RLBA. Self-collected specimens can provide valid specimens for HPV testing using nucleic acid amplification tests, although a few cytological abnormalities may be missed.
References
-
- Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention. 2004. Preventing cervical cancer worldwide. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC.
-
- Cuzick, J., A. Szarewski, H. Cubie, et al. 2003. Management of women who test positive for high-risk types of human papillomavirus: the HART study. Lancet 362:1871-1876. - PubMed
-
- Daponte, A., S. Pournaras, I. Mademtzis, et al. 2006. Evaluation of HPV 16 PCR detection in self- compared with clinician-collected samples in women referred for colposcopy. Gynecol. Oncol. 103:463-466. - PubMed
-
- Denny, L., L. Kuhn, M. De Souza, et al. 2005. Screen-and-treat approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294:2173-2181. - PubMed
-
- Dzuba, I. G., E. Y. Díaz, B. Allen, et al. 2002. The acceptability of self-collected samples for HPV testing vs. the pap test as alternatives in cervical cancer screening. J. Women's Health Gend.-Based Med. 11:265-275. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
