Radiology residency call: residents' perceptions of the on-call experience
- PMID: 17411968
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.06.007
Radiology residency call: residents' perceptions of the on-call experience
Abstract
Purpose: This paper focuses on specific resident perceptions of call, including the compliance of training programs with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) resident work rules and the level of comfort residents have in contacting out-of-house staff radiologists for help during on-call hours.
Methods: The authors designed a Web-based survey to examine radiology residents' perceptions about call conditions with input from the 2003-2004 ACR Resident and Fellow Section Executive Council. The survey instrument was distributed to chief residents in the United States and Canada with the help of the ACR.
Results: Eighty-five percent of respondents felt that the amounts of work and responsibility required for call were appropriate to their levels of training. Ninety-eight percent of US respondents felt that their programs were in complete compliance with the ACGME's resident work guidelines. Eighty-nine percent were comfortable contacting the staff physicians on call when those staff physicians were out of the hospital. Respondents who felt uncomfortable calling their staff physicians were more likely to feel that the work and responsibility of call were excessive to their levels of training (chi(2) = 11.301, P = .0033).
Conclusions: The majority of residents indicated that they were adequately trained for call. Most residents were on call without in-house staff coverage but felt comfortable contacting on-call staff physicians if needed. Residents who felt uncomfortable contacting on-call staff physicians were more likely to feel that their training had not prepared them for call. A high percentage of radiology resident programs are in compliance with the ACGME's resident work guidelines.
Comment in
-
Re: "Radiology residency call: residents' perceptions of the on-call experience".J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Mar;3(3):225; author reply 225. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.12.012. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006. PMID: 17412048 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Results of the 2004 survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar;12(3):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.12.014. Acad Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15766698
-
Is the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Resident/Fellow survey, a valid tool to assess general surgery residency programs compliance with work hours regulations?J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 7. J Surg Educ. 2010. PMID: 21156299
-
Impact of duty hour restrictions on otolaryngology training: divergent resident and faculty perspectives.Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1127-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000224348.44616.fb. Laryngoscope. 2006. PMID: 16826046
-
Resident duty hours: the rest of the story.J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.014. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004. PMID: 17411536 Review.
-
Day float: an alternative to the night float coverage system for residency programs.Laryngoscope. 2008 Jul;118(7):1257-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816bf52f. Laryngoscope. 2008. PMID: 18391766 Review.
Cited by
-
The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff.Emerg Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(4):303-8. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0795-9. Epub 2009 Jan 29. Emerg Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19184142
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous