Evaluation of a protocol for prevention of facility-acquired heel pressure ulcers
- PMID: 17413835
- DOI: 10.1097/01.WON.0000264832.33979.4e
Evaluation of a protocol for prevention of facility-acquired heel pressure ulcers
Abstract
Objective: We sought to determine whether identification of comorbidities (in addition to daily Braden scale assessment and early aggressive pressure reduction interventions) would impact the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcers (FAPU) of the heel.
Methods: Patients admitted to a 333-bed community hospital located 20 miles west of Chicago. Overall, 70 medical records were reviewed, while 242 adult patients (46 in the intervention groups and 196 in the control groups) and 24 nurses participated in the study. The study was conducted in 4 phases, including a retrospective chart audit, 2 prospective interventions, and a product evaluation. Phase 1 entailed a retrospective chart review of patients who were admitted with or developed heel pressure ulcers over a 2-year period to identify factors most predictive of skin breakdowns. Phase 2 included two 10-day aggressive assessment and tailored intervention periods. Phase 3 involved prevalence day assessments of effectiveness of interventions as compared to patients on control nursing units. Phase 4 involved a staff survey comparing effectiveness and satisfaction of the current and trial heel pressure-relieving products.
Findings: Risk factors for development of heel ulcers during hospital stay or prior to admission included type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), low albumin, and Braden scale score. During implementation of phase 2 (two 10-day assessment and tailored intervention periods), no heel FAPU were associated with the intervention. During the phase 3 FAPU prevalence assessment, 3 patients had facility-acquired heel ulcers; 2 were in the control group and would have met inclusion criteria if included in the intervention. One patient was in the intervention group but was not following the protocol. During phase 4, there were significant preferences for the trial heel pressure relief device on effectiveness, as well as patient and staff satisfaction.
Conclusion: A pressure ulcer prevention protocol that incorporated accurate assessment of risk factors (Braden Scale and comorbidities) with frequent documentation of heel skin integrity had a positive impact on the incidence of heel FAPU. In addition, early aggressive implementation of pressure-reducing and pressure-relieving devices was effective in reducing FAPU rates.
Similar articles
-
Reducing hospital-acquired heel ulcer rates in an acute care facility: an evaluation of a nurse-driven performance improvement project.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008 Jan-Feb;35(1):79-83. doi: 10.1097/01.WON.0000308622.86508.8d. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18199942
-
Use of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in a community hospital setting: the role of total score and individual subscale scores in triggering preventive interventions.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014 Nov-Dec;41(6):535-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000066. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2014. PMID: 25377103
-
Reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevalence through a focused prevention program.Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008 Feb;21(2):75-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000305410.58350.34. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2008. PMID: 18349734
-
Successful heel pressure ulcer prevention program in a long-term care setting.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;36(6):616-21. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181bd813e. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19920742 Review.
-
Are pressure redistribution surfaces or heel protection devices effective for preventing heel pressure ulcers?J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;36(6):602-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181be282f. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19920740 Review.
Cited by
-
What Is the Impact of Care Bundles on the Prevalence or Incidence of Pressure Ulcers Among At-Risk Adults in the Acute Care Setting? A Systematic Review.Int Wound J. 2025 Jun;22(6):e70693. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70693. Int Wound J. 2025. PMID: 40484807 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of best practice in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in the acute orthopedic population.Int Wound J. 2010 Feb;7(1):28-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00650.x. Int Wound J. 2010. PMID: 20409248 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of hospitalised US veterans with nosocomial pressure ulcers.Int Wound J. 2013 Feb;10(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00941.x. Epub 2012 Mar 16. Int Wound J. 2013. PMID: 22429486 Free PMC article.
-
Inter-Rater Reliability of a Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale for Home Care: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Dec 22;13:2031-2041. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S291162. eCollection 2020. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020. PMID: 33376343 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous