Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Jul;16(7):881-99.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0367-1. Epub 2007 Apr 6.

Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review

Pim A J Luijsterburg et al. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Patients with a lumbosacral radicular syndrome are mostly treated conservatively first. The effect of the conservative treatments remains controversial. To assess the effectiveness of conservative treatments of the lumbosacral radicular syndrome (sciatica). Relevant electronic databases and the reference lists of articles up to May 2004 were searched. Randomised clinical trials of all types of conservative treatments for patients with the lumbosacral radicular syndrome selected by two reviewers. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and the clinical relevance. Because the trials were considered heterogeneous we decided not to perform a meta-analysis but to summarise the results using the rating system of levels of evidence. Thirty trials were included that evaluated injections, traction, physical therapy, bed rest, manipulation, medication, and acupuncture as treatment for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome. Because several trials indicated no evidence of an effect it is not recommended to use corticosteroid injections and traction as treatment option. Whether clinicians should prescribe physical therapy, bed rest, manipulation or medication could not be concluded from this review. At present there is no evidence that one type of treatment is clearly superior to others, including no treatment, for patients with a lumbosacral radicular syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the selection process

References

    1. Berry H, Hutchinson DR. Tizanidine and ibuprofen in acute low-back pain: results of a double-blind multicentre study in general practice. J Int Med Res. 1988;16:83–91. - PubMed
    1. Borms T. Comparison of injectable formulations of tiaprofenic acid and ketoprofen in acute lumbar sciatica. Single-blind randomised trial. Drugs. 1988;35(Suppl 1):85–7. - PubMed
    1. Buchner M, Zeifang F, Brocai DR, Schiltenwolf M. Epidural corticosteroid injection in the conservative management of sciatica. Clin Orthop. 2000;375:149–56. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200006000-00018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Cleary J. Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:202–207. doi: 10.1007/s005869900113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bush K, Hillier S. A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica. Spine. 1991;16:572–575. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199105000-00015. - DOI - PubMed

Substances