Long term vision outcomes of conventional treatment of strabismic and anisometropic functional amblyopia
- PMID: 17417966
Long term vision outcomes of conventional treatment of strabismic and anisometropic functional amblyopia
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the long-term vision outcomes of amblyopia treatment in "successfully" compared with "unsuccessfully" treated patients.
Methods: Forty-two participants (n=42, mean age 14.8 years, range 10-25 years) were enrolled in the study. Individuals with strabismic or mixed (strabismic and anisometropic) amblyopia were examined at a mean of 6.6 years (range 1-18 years) after cessation of amblyopia treatment. Participants were classified as being "successfully" treated (Group 1) if visual acuity of 6/7.5 or better was achieved at cessation of treatment, or "unsuccessfully" treated (Group 2) if visual acuity of 6/9 or less was achieved at cessation of treatment. Visual acuity was analyzed by calculating an interocular score or difference in visual acuity between the amblyopic and non amblyopic normal (control) eye.
Results: A deterioration of visual acuity occurred in 62% of the participants in both Groups 1 and 2. The mean deterioration of visual acuity over time for either group was less than one LogMAR chart line and was not "statistically significant" by convention (F [1,39]=3.361, p=0.074). The outcomes achieved at cessation of treatment did not "statistically significantly" affect the mean deterioration that occurred over time (F [1,49]=0.031, p=0.860).
Conclusion: Visual acuity was relatively stable over a mean followup period of 6.6 years. The treatment outcome and the success of amblyopia treatment were found to be irrelevant to long term stability of visual acuity. These findings suggest that amblyopia treatment mostly results in a lasting improvement in visual acuity, and that both unsuccessfully and successfully treated individuals maintain their visual acuity improvement achieved during treatment.
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of visual acuity in a historical cohort of 137 patients treated for amblyopia by occlusion 30-35 years ago].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Jan;224(1):40-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927209. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007. PMID: 17260318 German.
-
Comparative efficacy of penalization methods in moderate to mild amblyopia.Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;145(3):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.029. Epub 2008 Jan 22. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18207121 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of occlusion treatment in amblyopia and clinical risk factors affecting the results of treatment.Strabismus. 2005 Jun;13(2):63-9. doi: 10.1080/09273970590922682. Strabismus. 2005. PMID: 16020359
-
Randomised controlled trial of intermittent photic stimulation for treating amblyopia in older children and adults.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011 Jan;31(1):56-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00801.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011. PMID: 21158885 Review.
-
[Severe amblyopia - literature review].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Oct;228(10):859-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281763. Epub 2011 Oct 13. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011. PMID: 21997821 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Refractive adaptation and efficacy of occlusion therapy in untreated amblyopic patients aged 12 to 40 years.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Feb;257(2):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4170-y. Epub 2018 Nov 5. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 30397791
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical