Inter-scan reproducibility of coronary calcium measurement using Multi Detector-Row Computed Tomography (MDCT)
- PMID: 17427036
- PMCID: PMC1914270
- DOI: 10.1007/s10654-007-9123-4
Inter-scan reproducibility of coronary calcium measurement using Multi Detector-Row Computed Tomography (MDCT)
Abstract
Purpose: To assess inter-scan reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements obtained from Multi Detector-Row CT (MDCT) images and to evaluate whether this reproducibility is affected by different measurement protocols, slice thickness, cardiovascular risk factors and/or technical variables.
Design: Cross-sectional study with repeated measurements.
Materials and methods: The study population comprised 76 healthy women. Coronary calcium was assessed in these women twice in one session using 16-MDCT (Philips Mx 8000 IDT 16). Images were reconstructed with 1.5 mm slice thickness and 3.0 mm slice thickness. The 76 repeated scans were scored. The Agatston score, a volume measurement and a mass measurement were assessed. Reproducibility was determined by estimation of mean, absolute, relative difference, the weighted kappa value for agreement and the Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICCC).
Results: Fifty-five participants (72.4%) had a coronary calcification of more than zero in Agatston (1.5 mm slice thickness). The reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements between scans in terms of ranking was excellent with Intra-class correlation coefficients of >0.98, and kappa values above 0.80. The absolute difference in calcium score between scans increased with increasing calcium levels, indicating that measurement error increases with increasing calcium levels. However, no relation was found between the mean difference in scores and calcium levels, indicating that the increase in measurement error is likely to result in random misclassification in calcium score. Reproducibility results were similar for 1.5 mm slices and for 3.0 mm slices, and equal for Agatston, volume and mass measurements.
Conclusion: Inter-scan reproducibilility of measurement of coronary calcium using images from MDCT is excellent, irrespective of slice thickness and type of calcium parameter.
Figures
References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '2278399', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2278399/'}]}
- Masuda Y, Naito S, Aoyagi Y, Yamada Z, Uda T, Morooka N, et al. Coronary artery calcification detected by CT: clinical significance and angiographic correlates. Angiology 1990;41(12):1037–47 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '14215099', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14215099/'}]}
- Beadenkopf WG, Daoud AS, Love BM. Calcification in the coronary arteries and its relationship to arteriosclerosis and myocardial infarction. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1964;92:865–71 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '5654020', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5654020/'}]}
- Warburton RK, Tampas JP, Soule AB, Taylor HC III. Coronary artery calcification: its relationship to coronary artery stenosis and myocardial infarction. Radiology 1968;91(1):109–15 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/0002-9149(70)90790-3', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(70)90790-3'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '5505449', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5505449/'}]}
- Frink RJ, Achor RW, Brown AL Jr, Kincaid OW, Brandenburg RO. Significance of calcification of the coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1970;26(3):241–7 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0002-8703(96)90237-9', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90237-9'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8800024', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8800024/'}]}
- Wang S, Detrano RC, Secci A, Tang W, Doherty TM, Puentes G, et al. Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J 1996;132(3):550–8 - PubMed
