Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Apr 11:8:20.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-20.

Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health: The PEACH study--a cluster randomised controlled trial using the telephone to coach people with type 2 diabetes to engage with their GPs to improve diabetes care: a study protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Patient Engagement and Coaching for Health: The PEACH study--a cluster randomised controlled trial using the telephone to coach people with type 2 diabetes to engage with their GPs to improve diabetes care: a study protocol

Doris Young et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The PEACH study is based on an innovative 'telephone coaching' program that has been used effectively in a post cardiac event trial. This intervention will be tested in a General Practice setting in a pragmatic trial using existing Practice Nurses (PN) as coaches for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Actual clinical care often fails to achieve standards, that are based on evidence that self-management interventions (educational and psychological) and intensive pharmacotherapy improve diabetes control. Telephone coaching in our study focuses on both. This paper describes our study protocol, which aims to test whether goal focused telephone coaching in T2D can improve diabetes control and reduce the treatment gap between guideline based standards and actual clinical practice.

Methods/design: In a cluster randomised controlled trial, general practices employing Practice Nurses (PNs) are randomly allocated to an intervention or control group. We aim to recruit 546 patients with poorly controlled T2D (HbA1c >7.5%) from 42 General Practices that employ PNs in Melbourne, Australia. PNs from General Practices allocated to the intervention group will be trained in diabetes telephone coaching focusing on biochemical targets addressing both patient self-management and engaging patients to work with their General Practitioners (GPs) to intensify pharmacological treatment according to the study clinical protocol. Patients of intervention group practices will receive 8 telephone coaching sessions and one face-to-face coaching session from existing PNs over 18 months plus usual care and outcomes will be compared to the control group, who will only receive only usual care from their GPs. The primary outcome is HbA1c levels and secondary outcomes include cardiovascular disease risk factors, behavioral risk factors and process of care measures.

Discussion: Understanding how to achieve comprehensive treatment of T2D in a General Practice setting is the focus of the PEACH study. This study explores the potential role for PNs to help reduce the treatment and outcomes gap in people with T2D by using telephone coaching. The intervention, if found to be effective, has potential to be sustained and embedded within real world General Practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of PEACH study recruitment process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of PEACH study intervention process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Colagiuri R, Colagiuri S, Yach D, Pramming S. The Answer to Diabetes Prevention: Science, Surgery, Service Delivery, or Social Policy? American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96:1562–1569. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067587. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunstan D, Zimmett P, Welborn T. The final Report of the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) International Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, ; 2001.
    1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). [comment][erratum appears in Lancet 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):602] Lancet. 1998;352:837–853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61359-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.[see comment] New England Journal of Medicine. 2003;348:383–393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021778. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control.[see comment] Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–1171. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.7.1159. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms