Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1711-21.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2062.

Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties

Affiliations

Spatial models of political competition with endogenous political parties

Michael Laver et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Two important human action selection processes are the choice by citizens of parties to support in elections and the choice by party leaders of policy 'packages' offered to citizens in order to attract this support. Having reviewed approaches analysing these choices and the reasons for doing this using the methodology of agent-based modelling, we extend a recent agent-based model of party competition to treat the number and identity of political parties as an output of, rather than an input to, the process of party competition. Party birth is modelled as an endogenous change of agent type from citizen to party leader, which requires describing citizen dissatisfaction with the history of the system. Endogenous birth and death of parties transforms into a dynamic system even in an environment where all agents have otherwise non-responsive adaptive rules. A key parameter is the survival threshold, with lower thresholds leaving citizens on average less dissatisfied. Paradoxically, the adaptive rule most successful for party leaders in winning votes makes citizens on average less happy than under other policy-selection rules.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Underlying dynamics of party competition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Birth-adapted numbers of parties (vertical axis) by survival threshold (lower horizontal axis label) and adaptive rule(upper horizontal axis label: S, sticker; A, aggregator; H, hunter); simulation tick greater than 1000.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Birth-adapted citizen dissatisfaction, measured in s.d. of the distribution of citizen ideal points (vertical axis), by survival threshold (lower horizontal axis label) and adaptive rule (upper horizontal axis label: S, sticker; A, aggregator; H, hunter); simulation tick greater than 1000.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Birth-adapted party eccentricity measured in s.d. of the distribution of citizen ideal points (vertical axis), by survival threshold (lower horizontal axis label) and adaptive rule (upper horizontal axis label: S, sticker; A, aggregator; H, hunter); simulation tick greater than 1000.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Eccentricity of births and deaths, measured in s.d. of the distribution of supporter ideal points (vertical axis), by threshold (horizontal axis) and rule (panel), for simulation ticks greater than 1000.

References

    1. Adams J. A theory of spatial competition with biased voters: party policies viewed temporally and comparatively. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 2001;31:121–158. doi:10.1017/S0007123401000060 - DOI
    1. Ansolabehere S, Snyder J.M. Valence politics and equilibrium in spatial election models. Public Choice. 2000;103:327–336. doi:10.1023/A:1005020606153 - DOI
    1. Aragones E, Palfrey T. Mixed equilibrium in a Downsian model with a favored candidate. J. Econ. Theory. 2002;103:131–161. doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2821 - DOI
    1. Aragones E, Palfrey T. The effect of candidate quality on electoral equilibrium: an experimental study. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2004;98:77–90. doi:10.1017/S0003055404001017 - DOI
    1. Austen-Smith D, Banks J. Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1988;82:405–422. doi:10.2307/1957393 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources