Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;45(1):40-6.

Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17432068

Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis

Liisa Airaksinen et al. Rhinology. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and clinical value of the nasal provocation test (NPT) with various allergens and non-IgE-mediated irritants in the diagnostics assessing occupational rhinitis.

Methods: A large number nasal provocation data from patients with suspected occupational rhinitis was evaluated retrospectively. The results of nasal provocation tests with different agents, as well as the correlation of nasal scoring to weighed mucus secretion, were analyzed.

Results: Altogether 507 NPTs were done in three years in 165 persons. In total, 39% of the allergen provocations (125/318) were positive. The most common positive reactions were against flours, animal epithelia, storage mites and various plants. Wood dusts, mainly through non-IgE-mediated reactions, gave 50% positive results. Positive NPTs to moulds were observed mainly in sensitized patients. Altogether, 10% of the control provocations were positive. The weighting of mucus secretion added sensitivity of NPT.

Conclusions: The NPT is an essential standard tool in the diagnostics of allergic occupational rhinitis; however it needs to be evaluated in the context of the medical and work history and knowledge of sensitization. Although expensive and laborious, NPT is safe and easy for the patient. We still need reliable diagnostic tools for non-allergic work-related rhinitis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Occupational rhinosinusitis.
    Hellgren J. Hellgren J. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008 May;8(3):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s11882-008-0039-1. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008. PMID: 18589842 Review.
  • Usefulness of Biomarkers in Work-Related Airway Disease.
    Lipińska-Ojrzanowska A, Marcinkiewicz A, Walusiak-Skorupa J. Lipińska-Ojrzanowska A, et al. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2017;4(2):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s40521-017-0121-9. Epub 2017 May 11. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2017. PMID: 28680796 Free PMC article. Review.
  • EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.
    Moscato G, Vandenplas O, Van Wijk RG, Malo JL, Perfetti L, Quirce S, Walusiak J, Castano R, Pala G, Gautrin D, De Groot H, Folletti I, Yacoub MR, Siracusa A; European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunolgy. Moscato G, et al. Respir Res. 2009 Mar 3;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-16. Respir Res. 2009. PMID: 19257881 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Appropriate Antigen Concentrations and Timing of a Nasal Provocation Test.
    Kim YH. Kim YH. Yonsei Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):750-757. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.750. Yonsei Med J. 2021. PMID: 34296553 Free PMC article.
  • Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.
    Scadding G, Hellings P, Alobid I, Bachert C, Fokkens W, van Wijk RG, Gevaert P, Guilemany J, Kalogjera L, Lund V, Mullol J, Passalacqua G, Toskala E, van Drunen C. Scadding G, et al. Clin Transl Allergy. 2011 Jun 10;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2. Clin Transl Allergy. 2011. PMID: 22410181 Free PMC article.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources