Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis
- PMID: 17432068
Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and clinical value of the nasal provocation test (NPT) with various allergens and non-IgE-mediated irritants in the diagnostics assessing occupational rhinitis.
Methods: A large number nasal provocation data from patients with suspected occupational rhinitis was evaluated retrospectively. The results of nasal provocation tests with different agents, as well as the correlation of nasal scoring to weighed mucus secretion, were analyzed.
Results: Altogether 507 NPTs were done in three years in 165 persons. In total, 39% of the allergen provocations (125/318) were positive. The most common positive reactions were against flours, animal epithelia, storage mites and various plants. Wood dusts, mainly through non-IgE-mediated reactions, gave 50% positive results. Positive NPTs to moulds were observed mainly in sensitized patients. Altogether, 10% of the control provocations were positive. The weighting of mucus secretion added sensitivity of NPT.
Conclusions: The NPT is an essential standard tool in the diagnostics of allergic occupational rhinitis; however it needs to be evaluated in the context of the medical and work history and knowledge of sensitization. Although expensive and laborious, NPT is safe and easy for the patient. We still need reliable diagnostic tools for non-allergic work-related rhinitis.
Similar articles
-
Nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational allergic rhinitis.Rhinology. 1996 Jun;34(2):86-90. Rhinology. 1996. PMID: 8876069
-
Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.Laryngoscope. 2005 Mar;115(3):512-6. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000149682.56426.6B. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 15744168
-
Comparison of SPT and NPT in the ascertainment of nasal mucosa as shock organ.Rhinology. 1996 Sep;34(3):160-2. Rhinology. 1996. PMID: 8938885
-
Nasal provocation testing: a review.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Apr;86(4):355-64; quiz 364-5, 386. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62478-7. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001. PMID: 11345277 Review.
-
Allergen-specific nasal provocation testing: review by the rhinoconjunctivitis committee of the Spanish Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(1):1-12; quiz follow 12. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011. PMID: 21370717 Review.
Cited by
-
Occupational rhinosinusitis.Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008 May;8(3):234-9. doi: 10.1007/s11882-008-0039-1. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008. PMID: 18589842 Review.
-
Usefulness of Biomarkers in Work-Related Airway Disease.Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2017;4(2):181-190. doi: 10.1007/s40521-017-0121-9. Epub 2017 May 11. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2017. PMID: 28680796 Free PMC article. Review.
-
EAACI position paper on occupational rhinitis.Respir Res. 2009 Mar 3;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-10-16. Respir Res. 2009. PMID: 19257881 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Appropriate Antigen Concentrations and Timing of a Nasal Provocation Test.Yonsei Med J. 2021 Aug;62(8):750-757. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.8.750. Yonsei Med J. 2021. PMID: 34296553 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.Clin Transl Allergy. 2011 Jun 10;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-1-2. Clin Transl Allergy. 2011. PMID: 22410181 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical