Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Aug;100(2):392-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06909.x. Epub 2007 Apr 13.

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome

Affiliations

Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome

Chi-Fai Ng et al. BJU Int. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of patient age on the stone-free rate (SFR) in patients with urinary calculi treated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Patients and methods: In all, 2192 solitary radio-opaque urinary stones of 5-15 mm were identified in adult patients receiving primary ESWL. Patients were divided into three age groups, i.e. < or = 40, 41-60 and >60 years (579, 1026 and 587 patients, respectively). Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the effect of age and other possible predicting factors (gender, stone characteristics, e.g. side, site and size, and the type of lithotripter used) on the SFR at 3 months after treatment.

Results: The overall adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for the SFR for those aged 41-60 and >60 years (taking those aged < or= 40 years as the reference) were 0.708 (0.573-0.875; P = 0.001) and 0.643 (0.506-0.818; P < 0.001). However, if the patients were divided into those with renal or ureteric stones, only the SFR of the former was affected by age, and the adjusted odds ratios were 0.665 (0.512-0.864; P = 0.002) and 0.629 (0.470-0.841; P = 0.002), respectively. Ageing had no effect on the SFR for ureteric stones.

Conclusion: The SFR after ESWL for renal stones, but not ureteric stones, was significantly lower in older patients. Further studies on the effects of ageing on renal stone clearance after ESWL are needed to improve stone management in the elderly population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources