Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Oct;36(10 Pt 1):1378-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2006.12.032. Epub 2007 Apr 11.

[Mortality-morbidity conferences: evaluation of an intervention to expand their practice in a university hospital]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Mortality-morbidity conferences: evaluation of an intervention to expand their practice in a university hospital]

[Article in French]
Gwenaëlle Vidal-Trécan et al. Presse Med. 2007 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Mortality-morbidity conferences (M&MC) are a recognized technique for evaluating and improving medical practices as well as improving patient safety.

Objectives: To describe the current practices for identification and management of care-related adverse events and to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to promote M&MC in a university hospital.

Methods: The study was designed as a before-and-after survey. In the first part of the survey (September-December 2004), we interviewed the heads of the clinical departments and units in a Parisian university hospital (n=37), using a semi-structured questionnaire. Questions concerned the management of adverse events or errors in their departments or units. The intervention took place during these interviews and consisted of providing information on methods currently available to improve inpatient safety, including broad-based M&MC. The second part involved a structured questionnaire sent by e-mail in December 2005.

Results: In 2004, 24 of the 37 departments discussed adverse events, 11 kept a register of them, and 9 used M&MC, mostly covering a specific limited segment of their specialty field. Only 2 used structured M&MC that covered the entire specialty field. In 2005, 3 departments had expanded the field covered by their M&MC, and 9 had established M&MC for their entire field (n=12). Six departments had not changed the field of their M&MC and 14 had not introduced it.

Conclusion: Our survey of department heads allowed us both to collect information about the methods they used for managing and evaluating adverse events and to provide information to them. This intervention may have contributed to increasing and improving the use of M&MC.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources