Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;193(5):600-5; discussion 605.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.015.

Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: the surgical perspective

Affiliations

Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: the surgical perspective

J David Beatty et al. Am J Surg. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: Contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown excellent sensitivity (93%) for breast malignancies. The clinical role and value of MRI for the breast surgeon remains unresolved and controversial.

Methods: A retrospective review of clinical and imaging records was undertaken for 79 surgical patients evaluated by MRI as part of their initial assessment.

Results: Of 79 patients, 71 (90%) had dense mammograms, 64 (81%) had known primary breast cancer (BrCA), 42 (53%) had a family history of BrCA, and 8 (10%) had known breast atypia. MRI identified a larger than clinically suspected BrCA size in 10 (16%) patients and greater BrCA extent in 26 (41%) patients. Of 15 non-BrCA patients, 10 (67%) had a biopsy after the MRI with identification of BrCA in 6 (40%) patients. Overall, there were 20 MRI-initiated core biopsies, of which 14 (70%) identified BrCA. Of 70 BrCA patients, 13 (19%) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 35 (50%) had breast-conserving surgery, 36 (51%) had total mastectomy, and 14 (22%) had bilateral total mastectomy. MRI had good pathology correlation in 56 of 62 (90%) patients. In patients with known BrCA (by core biopsy), none of the 29 breast-conserving surgery resections undertaken after MRI had a positive margin or required re-excision.

Conclusions: MRI is very accurate for BrCA evaluation, both for lesion size and extent. With good collaboration between the radiologist and surgeon, MRI is a powerful 3-dimensional and communication tool for the breast surgeon and the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources