Determination of a safe range of knee flexion angles for fixation of the grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a human cadaveric study
- PMID: 17435061
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546507300822
Determination of a safe range of knee flexion angles for fixation of the grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a human cadaveric study
Abstract
Background: For anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a double-bundle procedure, one of the major concerns is to not predispose either one of the grafts to risk of failure by overloading.
Hypothesis: Knee flexion angles between 15 degrees and 45 degrees for anteromedial graft fixation and 15 degrees for posterolateral graft fixation are safe for both grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Study design: Controlled laboratory study.
Methods: Nine human cadaveric knees were tested. The double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was conducted with both grafts fixed at 15 degrees of knee flexion (fixation protocol 15/15) and again with the anteromedial and posterolateral grafts fixed at 45 degrees and 15 degrees of knee flexion (fixation protocol 45/15). For both fixation protocols, the knee kinematics and the in situ forces of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament and its individual grafts were measured and collected under an anterior tibial load of 134 N and combined rotatory loads of 10 N.m of valgus and 5 N.m of internal tibial torque. The data from both fixation protocols were compared with those of an intact knee.
Results: In response to the 2 external loading conditions, both fixation protocols (15/15 and 45/15) could restore the knee kinematics to within 2 mm of the intact knee (although statistically significant differences were found between fixation protocol 15/15 and the intact knee) and the overall in situ forces in the grafts similar to the intact anterior cruciate ligament. In response to the 134-N anterior tibial load, the in situ forces in the anteromedial graft for both fixation protocols did not exceed those of the intact anteromedial bundle. But at 30 degrees and 45 degrees of knee flexion, the in situ forces for fixation protocol 15/15 were 20.7% and 22.1% lower, respectively, when compared with the intact anteromedial bundle. Under combined rotatory loads, the anteromedial graft for fixation protocol 15/15 had in situ forces that were 45% lower than the intact anteromedial bundle at 30 degrees of knee flexion. The in situ force in the posterolateral graft for both fixation protocols did not exceed those of the intact posterolateral bundle, nor were they significantly different from the intact posterolateral bundle at any of the flexion angles tested.
Conclusion: Both fixation protocols restored knee kinematics without predisposing either graft to failure. Therefore, knee flexion angles between 15 degrees and 45 degrees for graft fixation were found to be safe for the anteromedial graft, while 15 degrees of knee flexion was safe for the posterolateral graft.
Clinical relevance: A range of knee flexion angles that is safe for the fixation of both grafts in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was determined.
Similar articles
-
Effects of knee flexion angles for graft fixation on force distribution in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament grafts.Am J Sports Med. 2006 Apr;34(4):577-85. doi: 10.1177/0363546505281814. Epub 2005 Nov 10. Am J Sports Med. 2006. PMID: 16282574
-
Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):107-18. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01215. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009. PMID: 19122085
-
Posterior cruciate ligament graft fixation angles, part 2: biomechanical evaluation for anatomic double-bundle reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2014 Oct;42(10):2346-55. doi: 10.1177/0363546514541226. Epub 2014 Aug 4. Am J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 25091116
-
Soft tissue allograft and double-bundle reconstruction.Clin Sports Med. 2007 Oct;26(4):639-60. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2007.06.004. Clin Sports Med. 2007. PMID: 17920958 Review.
-
Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009 Dec;17(4):247-51. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181c0ccf8. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009. PMID: 19910783 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanical Difference between Conventional Transtibial Single-Bundle and Anatomical Transportal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Model Analysis.J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 12;10(8):1625. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081625. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33921263 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of graft fixation sequence on knee joint biomechanics in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Mar;23(3):655-60. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3158-3. Epub 2014 Jul 5. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015. PMID: 24996866
-
Effects of different initial bundle tensioning strategies on the outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a cohort study.Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011 Jul 28;3:15. doi: 10.1186/1758-2555-3-15. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2011. PMID: 21794179 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of two graft tension protocols.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 9;17:65. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0909-y. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016. PMID: 26857109 Free PMC article.
-
In situ forces in the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament under simulated functional loading conditions.Am J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):558-63. doi: 10.1177/0363546509350110. Epub 2009 Dec 31. Am J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20044500 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical