Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;61(5):401-8.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.048306.

Educational differences in mobility: the contribution of physical workload, obesity, smoking and chronic conditions

Affiliations

Educational differences in mobility: the contribution of physical workload, obesity, smoking and chronic conditions

Päivi Sainio et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: In earlier studies, determinants of socioeconomic gradient in mobility have not been measured comprehensively.

Aim: To assess the contribution of chronic morbidity, obesity, smoking and physical workload to inequalities in mobility.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on 2572 persons (76% of a nationally representative sample of the Finnish population aged > or = 55 years). Mobility limitations were measured by self-reports and performance rates.

Results: According to a wide array of self-reported and test-based indicators, persons with a lower level of education showed more mobility limitations than those with a higher level. The age-adjusted ORs for limitations in stair climbing were threefold in the lowest-educational category compared with the highest one (OR 3.3 in men and 2.9 in women for self-reported limitations, and 3.5 in men and 2.2 in women for test-based limitations). When obesity, smoking, work-related physical loading and clinically diagnosed chronic diseases were simultaneously accounted for, the educational differences in stair-climbing limitations vanished or were greatly diminished. In women, obesity contributed most to the differences, followed by a history of physically strenuous work, knee and hip osteoarthritis and cardiovascular diseases. In men, diabetes, work-related physical loading, musculoskeletal diseases, obesity and smoking contributed substantially to the inequalities.

Conclusions: Great educational inequalities exist in various measures of mobility. Common chronic diseases, obesity, smoking and workload appeared to be the main pathways from low education to mobility limitations. General health promotion using methods that also yield good results in the lowest-educational groups is thus a good strategy to reduce the disparities in mobility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guralnik J M, Ferrucci L, Simonsick E M.et al Lower‐extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995332556–561. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001
    1. Ahacic K, Parker M G, Thorslund M. Mobility limitations in the Swedish population from 1968 to 1992: age, gender and social class differences. Aging (Milano) 200012190–198. - PubMed
    1. Sulander T T, Rahkonen O J, Uutela A K. Functional ability in the elderly Finnish population: time period differences and associations, 1985–99. Scand J Public Health 200331100–106. - PubMed
    1. Graciani A, Banegas J R, Lopez‐Garcia E.et al Prevalence of disability and associated social and health‐related factors among the elderly in Spain: a population‐based study. Maturitas 200448381–392. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms