Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Mar;245(3):392-6.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000250412.08210.8e.

Prophylactic antibiotics for mesh inguinal hernioplasty: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prophylactic antibiotics for mesh inguinal hernioplasty: a meta-analysis

Alvaro Sanabria et al. Ann Surg. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in mesh hernioplasty.

Background: Antibiotic prophylaxis use in mesh inguinal hernioplasty is controversial. Available evidence is nonconclusive because of the low number of clinical trials assessing its effectiveness. Some trials have a small sample size that could overestimate or underestimate the real effectiveness of this intervention. Meta-analysis is a good method to improve these methodological flaws.

Methods: Meta-analysis intended to measure the benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infection rate in adult patients scheduled for mesh inguinal hernioplasty. Six randomized clinical trials were found. Quality was assessed using Cochrane Collaboration criteria.

Results: A total of 2507 patients were analyzed. Surgical site infection frequency was 1.38% in the antibiotic group versus 2.89% in the control group (odds ratio = 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.85). There was no statistical heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis by quality did not show differences in overall results.

Conclusion: Antibiotic prophylaxis use in patients submitted to mesh inguinal hernioplasty decreased the rate of surgical site infection by almost 50%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Forest plot for effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in mesh hernioplasty.
None
FIGURE 2. Funnel plot for studies assessing effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in mesh hernioplasty.
None
FIGURE 3. Begg method plot for publication bias evaluation.
None
FIGURE 4. Forest plot in sensitivity analysis by quality, excluding the Celdran et al study.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bendavid R. Complications of groin hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:1089–1103. - PubMed
    1. Abo RE. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal surgery for hernia repair: retrospective study of 1,524 consecutive patients. J Chemother. 1998;10:248–253. - PubMed
    1. Taylor EW, Duffy K, Lee K, et al. Surgical site infection after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2004;91:105–111. - PubMed
    1. Deysine M. Pathophysiology, prevention, and management of prosthetic infections in hernia surgery. Surg Clin North Am 1998;78:1105–1115. - PubMed
    1. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15–21.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources