Permanent cardiac pacing in children: morbidity and efficacy of follow-up
- PMID: 1743780
- DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(91)90348-s
Permanent cardiac pacing in children: morbidity and efficacy of follow-up
Abstract
The data from 50 permanently paced children [mean standard deviation follow-up 5.3 +/- 3.7 years] were reviewed, with special attention being paid to the cause of complications and the efficacy of follow-up. The 5-year survival (SD) of the patients was 78 +/- 6%; mortality was mainly due to the underlying cardiac disease. The 5-year survival (SD) of the pacing systems was 48 +/- 8%. Surgical interventions were necessary every 4.9 patient years. Of these interventions, 58% were caused by lead-related problems. Epicardial leads showed significantly more exit blocks and high thresholds than endocardial leads. Endocardial leads, therefore, should be used at a younger age than is now the current practice, from 5 years of age onwards, for example. If epicardial leads are used, the pacemaker must have a high output facility. Since exit block occurred only within the first 3 months after implantation, we suggest frequent transtelephonic monitoring during the first 3 months. Holter monitoring appeared to be the most effective and sensitive method of detecting malsensing and should be performed regularly.
Similar articles
-
Equivalent performance of epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in children: a single institution and manufacturer experience.Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.075. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008. PMID: 18355537
-
Permanent epicardial pacing in pediatric patients: 12-year experience at a single center.Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Feb;93(2):634-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.09.072. Epub 2011 Dec 21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22192754
-
Trends in pediatric cardiac pacing.Can J Cardiol. 1995 Dec;11(11):993-9. Can J Cardiol. 1995. PMID: 8542548
-
Efficacy of prophylactic epicardial pacing leads in children and young adults.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jul;78(1):197-202; discussion 202-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.008. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15223427 Review.
-
Cardiac strangulation from epicardial pacemaker: early recognition and prevention.Cardiol Young. 2011 Aug;21(4):471-3. doi: 10.1017/S1047951111000242. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Cardiol Young. 2011. PMID: 21411028 Review.
Cited by
-
Wandering permanent pacemaker generators in children: a case series.J Med Case Rep. 2008 May 18;2:163. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-163. J Med Case Rep. 2008. PMID: 18485236 Free PMC article.
-
Original Article--Outcomes of Pacing in Egyptian Pediatric Population.J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2021 Apr 15;33(1):61-70. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1244. eCollection 2021. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2021. PMID: 33880330 Free PMC article.
-
Case series of late lead dislodgement of Medtronic SelectSecure 3830 pacing leads in growing paediatric patients.Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021 Jan 12;5(2):ytaa545. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa545. eCollection 2021 Feb. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 33598620 Free PMC article.
-
Implantation of pacemaker for sick sinus syndrome in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava and absent right superior vena cava.Heart Vessels. 2008 May;23(3):206-8. doi: 10.1007/s00380-007-1032-7. Epub 2008 May 17. Heart Vessels. 2008. PMID: 18484165
-
Vergleich endokardialer und epimyokardialer Elektrodenwerte im Langzeitverlauf. Eine kinderkardiologische Untersuchung.Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 1998 Feb;9 Suppl 1:122-3. doi: 10.1007/BF03042465. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 1998. PMID: 19484576 German. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical