A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures
- PMID: 17440339
- DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258827.21635.84
A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures
Abstract
Background: The authors aimed to quantify overall patient satisfaction with three breast reconstruction techniques and identify factors that have influenced satisfaction.
Methods: Two hundred sixty-eight questionnaires were mailed at least 6 months after immediate breast reconstruction to consecutive breast reconstruction patients over a 3-year period. A second questionnaire was sent out 9 months later to the tissue expander/implant group of patients.
Results: The initial questionnaire demonstrated that overall satisfaction was significantly greater in the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap patients as compared with the tissue expander/implant patients (p < 0.05). However, the number of patients willing to repeat the procedure and recommend their procedure to a friend was similar among all three reconstructive techniques. A significantly greater number of tissue expander/implant patients as compared with TRAM flap patients felt they had not received sufficient information to make an educated decision (p < 0.05). This finding correlated with the lower satisfaction rate among the tissue expander/implant patients. The second questionnaire sent only to the tissue expander/implant patients revealed that the majority felt uninformed about the final aesthetic outcome and the frequency and pain associated with the expansion process.
Conclusions: All three groups may claim to be satisfied with their own personal choices. Many patients will continue to choose tissue expander/implant reconstruction in an effort to avoid scars and more extensive surgery. Being less satisfied is not wrong or bad, provided it is known. Tissue expander/implant patients should be thoroughly informed in the preoperative setting about the final aesthetic outcomes and the immediate perioperative expansion period, which may involve a considerable amount of patient commitment and discomfort in some women.
References
-
- Kroll, S. S., and Baldwin, B. A comparison of outcomes using three methods of breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 90: 455, 1992.
-
- Trabulsy, P. P., Anthony, J. P., and Mathes, S. J. Changing trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A 13-year experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 93: 1418, 1994.
-
- Spear, S. L., and Majidian, A. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants: A retrospective review of 171 consecutive breast reconstructions from 1989 to 1996. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 53, 1998.
-
- Alderman, A. D., Wilkins, E. G., Lowery, J. C., Kim, M., and Davis, J. A. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 769, 2000.
-
- Andrade, W. N., Baxter, N., and Semple, J. L. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 46, 2001.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
