Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 May;119(6):1669-1676.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000258827.21635.84.

A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures

Alexandrina S Saulis et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: The authors aimed to quantify overall patient satisfaction with three breast reconstruction techniques and identify factors that have influenced satisfaction.

Methods: Two hundred sixty-eight questionnaires were mailed at least 6 months after immediate breast reconstruction to consecutive breast reconstruction patients over a 3-year period. A second questionnaire was sent out 9 months later to the tissue expander/implant group of patients.

Results: The initial questionnaire demonstrated that overall satisfaction was significantly greater in the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap patients as compared with the tissue expander/implant patients (p < 0.05). However, the number of patients willing to repeat the procedure and recommend their procedure to a friend was similar among all three reconstructive techniques. A significantly greater number of tissue expander/implant patients as compared with TRAM flap patients felt they had not received sufficient information to make an educated decision (p < 0.05). This finding correlated with the lower satisfaction rate among the tissue expander/implant patients. The second questionnaire sent only to the tissue expander/implant patients revealed that the majority felt uninformed about the final aesthetic outcome and the frequency and pain associated with the expansion process.

Conclusions: All three groups may claim to be satisfied with their own personal choices. Many patients will continue to choose tissue expander/implant reconstruction in an effort to avoid scars and more extensive surgery. Being less satisfied is not wrong or bad, provided it is known. Tissue expander/implant patients should be thoroughly informed in the preoperative setting about the final aesthetic outcomes and the immediate perioperative expansion period, which may involve a considerable amount of patient commitment and discomfort in some women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kroll, S. S., and Baldwin, B. A comparison of outcomes using three methods of breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 90: 455, 1992.
    1. Trabulsy, P. P., Anthony, J. P., and Mathes, S. J. Changing trends in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A 13-year experience. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 93: 1418, 1994.
    1. Spear, S. L., and Majidian, A. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants: A retrospective review of 171 consecutive breast reconstructions from 1989 to 1996. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 101: 53, 1998.
    1. Alderman, A. D., Wilkins, E. G., Lowery, J. C., Kim, M., and Davis, J. A. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 769, 2000.
    1. Andrade, W. N., Baxter, N., and Semple, J. L. Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 107: 46, 2001.

Publication types

MeSH terms