Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status
- PMID: 17441024
- DOI: 10.1002/rcs.122
Robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of the current status
Abstract
Background: Over the last decade minimally invasive endourologic and laparoscopic techniques have become the first line therapies for primary UPJ obstruction. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the correction of ureteropelvic junction has achieved outcomes comparable to those of open and laparoscopic techniques. We present a comprehensive review of the current literature of robotic assisted pyeloplasty.
Methods: We performed a systemic review of all the current literature examining demographic data, intra operative parameters and post-operative outcomes.
Results: In most published series in the literature, the operative time ranges from 122 to 300 minutes and the operative time ranges from 27 to 77 ml. Most series considers subjective improvement in the symptoms and improved drainage on post-operative diuretic renal scan as the measures of success. The reported success rates vary from 89 to 100%.
Conclusion: Robotic pyeloplasty is a feasible alternative to laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Short-term results indicate equivalent outcomes with the laparoscopic procedure. Long-term studies are still needed to compare robotic and open pyeloplasty outcomes, and to define the role of robotic pyeloplasty in a cost prohibitive health care system.
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1722-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10. BJU Int. 2009. PMID: 19519760 Review.
-
Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.Can J Urol. 2010 Apr;17(2):5099-108. Can J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20398449 Review.
-
Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.Int J Med Robot. 2007 Mar;3:20-2. doi: 10.1002/rcs.118. Int J Med Robot. 2007. PMID: 17441021 Review.
-
Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Jul;16(4):291-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mou.0000232052.74342.a0. Curr Opin Urol. 2006. PMID: 16770130 Review.
-
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty.Urology. 2005 Jul;66(1):45-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.01.053. Urology. 2005. PMID: 15992879
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a single-centre experience.Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4590-4596. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6212-2. Epub 2018 May 17. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29777349
-
Early Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Infants Under 3 Months With Severe Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction.Front Pediatr. 2021 Mar 10;9:590865. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.590865. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33777859 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.J Robot Surg. 2008;1(4):247-52. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0065-3. Epub 2008 Jan 8. J Robot Surg. 2008. PMID: 25484972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Passing from open to robotic surgery for dismembered pyeloplasty: a single centre experience.Springerplus. 2014 Oct 3;3:580. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-580. eCollection 2014. Springerplus. 2014. PMID: 25332880 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys: initial experience.J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):99-102. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0142-x. Epub 2009 Jun 6. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638223
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources