Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD002214.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002214.pub3.

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units

P D Griffiths et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The Nursing led inpatient Unit (NLU) is one of a range of services that have been considered in order to manage more successfully the transition between hospital and home for patients with extended recovery times. This is an update of an earlier review published in The Cochrane Library in Issue 3, 2004.

Objectives: To determine whether nursing-led inpatient units are effective in preparing patients for discharge from hospital compared to usual inpatient care.

Search strategy: We searched The Cochrane Library, the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, BNI and HMIC databases. Citation searches were undertaken on the science and social science citation indices. Authors were contacted to identify additional data. The initial search was done in January 2001. The register search was updated in October 2006, the other database searches were updated in November 2006 and the citation search was run in January 2007.

Selection criteria: Controlled trials and interrupted time series designs that compared the NLU to usual inpatient care managed by doctors. Patients over 18 years of age following an acute hospital admission for a physical health condition.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality.

Main results: Ten random or quasi-random controlled trials reported on a total of 1896 patients. There was no statistically significant effect on inpatient mortality (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.56 to 2.16) or mortality to longest follow up (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.29) but higher quality studies showed a larger non-significant increase in inpatient mortality (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.86 to 2.68). Discharge to institutional care was reduced for the NLU (OR 0.44 95% CI 0.22 to 0.89) and functional status at discharge increased (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.54) but there was a near significant increase in inpatient stay (WMD 5.13 days 95% CI -0.5 days to 10.76 days). Early readmissions were reduced (OR 0.52 95% CI 0.34 to 0.80). One study compared a NLU for the chronically critically ill with ICU care. Mortality (OR 0.62 95% CI 0.35 to 1.10) and length of inpatient stay differ did not differ (WMD 2 days, 95% CI 10.96 to -6.96 days). Early readmissions were reduced (OR 0.33 95% CI 0.12 to 0.94). Costs of care on the NLU were higher for UK studies but lower for US based studies.

Authors' conclusions: There is some evidence that patients discharged from a NLU are better prepared for discharge but it is unclear if this is simply a product of an increased length of inpatient stay. No statistically significant adverse effects were noted but the possibility of increased early mortality cannot be discounted. More research is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Peter Griffiths and Ruth Harris have both published studies that were included in this review. Other reviewers considered the methodological quality of these studies.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 1 Inpatient mortality.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 2 Early post discharge death (4‐6 weeks).
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 3 Mortality within 3 months of admission (12 weeks / 90 days).
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 4 Mortality within 6 months of admission (24 weeks / 180 days).
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 5 Mortality to longest follow up (within 6 months).
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 6 Discharge to institutional care.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 7 Independent at discharge.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 8 Institutional care to longest follow up.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 9 Functional Status.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 10 Change in functional Status (admission to discharge).
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 11 Length of stay to first discharge from hospital setting.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 12 Length of stay to first discharge home.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 13 Early readmission (within 30 days).
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 14 Quality of life / health status.
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 15 Quality of life / health status change scores only.
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 16 Psychological wellbeing.
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 NLU vs general inpatient care, Outcome 17 Satisfaction.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 NLU vs ICU, Outcome 1 Inpatient mortality.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 NLU vs ICU, Outcome 2 Mortality to longest follow up (Up to 24 months).
2.3
2.3. Analysis
Comparison 2 NLU vs ICU, Outcome 3 Discharge to institutional care.
2.4
2.4. Analysis
Comparison 2 NLU vs ICU, Outcome 4 Length of stay to first discharge home.
2.5
2.5. Analysis
Comparison 2 NLU vs ICU, Outcome 5 Early readmission (within 30 days).

Update of

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Bowcutt 2000 {published data only}
    1. Bowcutt M, Andrews BC, Kaye J. Subacute care: a competitive response to providing geriatric care. Journal of Nursing Adminisatration 2000;30(6):300‐303. - PubMed
Daly 1995 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Daly BJ, Phelps C, Rudy EB. A nurse‐managed special care unit. Journal of Nursing Administration 1991;21(7/8):31‐8. - PubMed
    1. Douglas S, Daly B, Rudy E, Song R, Dyer MA, Montenegro H. The cost‐effectiveness of a special care unit to care for the chronically critically ill. Journal of Nursing Administration 1995;25(11):47‐53. - PubMed
    1. Douglas S, Daly BJ, Rudy EB, Sereika SM, Menzel L, Song R, et al. Survival experience of chronically critically ill patients. Nursing Research. 1996, 45(2):73‐7. Survival experience of chronically critically ill patients. Nursing Research 1996;45(2):73‐77. - PubMed
    1. Rudy EB, Daly BJ, Douglas S, Montenegro HD, Song R, Dyer MA. Patient outcomes for the chronically critically ill: special care unit versus intensive care unit [see comments]. Nursing Research 1995;44(6):324‐31. - PubMed
Davies 1994 {published data only}
    1. Davies SM. An evaluation of nurse‐led team care within a rehabilitation ward for elderly people. Journal of Clinical Nursing 1994;3(1):25‐33. - PubMed
Griffiths 1995 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Griffiths P. Clinical outcomes for nurse‐led in‐patient care. Nursing Times 1996;92(9):40‐3. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths P. Evaluation of nurse‐led in‐patient care. Nursing Times 1995;91(43):34‐7. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths P, Evans A. Evaluating a nursing led in‐patient service: an interim report. London: King's Fund, 1995.
Griffiths 2000 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Griffiths P, Wilson‐Barnett J, Richardson G, Spilsbury K, Miller F, Harris R. The effectiveness of intermediate care in a nursing‐led in‐patient unit. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2000;37(2):153‐61. - PubMed
    1. Griffiths, P. Evaluation of a Nursing‐led In‐patient Unit [PhD Thesis}. London: King's College, University of London, 1998.
    1. Griffiths, P. Nursing‐led in‐patient units for intermediate care: a survey of multidisciplinary discharge planning practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2001;1(3):322‐330. - PubMed
    1. Richardson G, Griffiths P, Spilsbury P, Wilson‐Barnett J, Batehup L. Economic evaluation of a nursing‐led intermediate care unit.. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2001;17:442‐450. - PubMed
Griffiths 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Griffiths P, Harris R, Richardson G, Hallett N, Heard S, Wilson‐Barnett J. Substitution of a nursing‐led inpatient unit for acute services: randomised controlled trial of outcomes and cost of nursing‐led intermediate care. Age and Ageing 2001;2001(30):483‐8. - PubMed
    1. NLIU Evaluation Project Team. Substitution of "Nursing‐led In‐patient Units" for Acute Services. Vol. Report OM438., London: North Thames Regional health Authority, 1999.
Hall 1975 {unpublished data only}
    1. Alfano, G. A different kind of nursing.. Nursing Outlook 1988;36(1):34‐39. - PubMed
    1. Hall L, Alfons G, Rifkin E, Levine H. Final Report: Longitudinal Effects of an Experimental Nursing Process. New York: Loeb Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation (Unpublished), 1975.
Pearson 1988a {published data only}
    1. Pearson A. Nursing at Burford: a story of change. Harrow: Scutari Press, 1992.
    1. Pearson A, Durand I, Punton S. The feasibility and effectiveness of nursing beds. Nursing Times 1988;84(47):48‐50. - PubMed
    1. Pearson A, Punton S, Durant I. Nursing Beds: An evaluation of the effects of therapeutic nursing. Harrow: Scutari Press, 1992.
Pearson 1988b {published data only}
    1. Baker H, Pearson A. The experience of patients in a professional nursing unit. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 1991;9(1):15‐9. - PubMed
    1. Pearson A, Durant I, Punton S. Determining quality in a unit where nursing is the primary intervention. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1989;14(4):269‐73. - PubMed
    1. Pearson A, Durant I, Punton S. Effects of admission to a nursing unit. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 1988;6(1):38‐42. - PubMed
    1. Pearson A. Therapeutic nursing ‐ transforming models and theories in action. Recent Advances in Nursing 1989;24:123‐151. - PubMed
    1. Pearson A, Punton S, Durant I. Nursing Beds: An evaluation of the effects of therapeutic nursing. Harrow: Scutari Press, 1992.
Steiner 2001 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Steiner A, Walsh B, Pickering RM, Wiles R, Ward J, Brooking JI, et al. Therapeutic nursing or unblocking beds? A randomised controlled trial of a post‐acute intermediate care unit. BMJ 2001;322(7284):453‐60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh B, Steiner A, Pickering RM, Ward‐Basu J. Economic evaluation of nurse led intermediate care versus standard care for post‐acute medical patients: cost minimisation analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330::699. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh B, Steiner A, Warr J, Sheron L, Pickering R. Nurse‐led inpatient care: opening the 'black box'.. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2003;40(3):307‐316. - PubMed
    1. Wiles R, Postle K, Steiner A, Walsh B. Nurse‐led intermediate care: an opportunity to develop enhanced roles for nurses?. J Adv Nurs 2001;34(6):813‐21. - PubMed
    1. Wiles R, Postle K, Steiner A, Walsh B. Nurse‐led intermediate care: patients' perceptions. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2003;40(1):61‐71. - PubMed
Walsh 1999 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Walsh B, Pickering R, Brooking J. A randomized controlled trial of nurse‐led inpatient care for post acute medical patients: a pilot study. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing 1999;3(2):88‐90.

References to studies excluded from this review

Bachmann 1987 {published data only}
    1. Bachman SS, Collard AF, Greenberg JN, Fountain E, Huebner TW, Kimball B, et al. An innovative approach to geriatric acute care delivery: the Choate‐Symmes experience. Hospital & Health Services Administration 1987;32(4):509‐20. - PubMed
    1. Collard AF, Bachman SS, Beatrice DF. Acute care delivery for the geriatric patient: an innovative approach. Quality Review Bulletin 1985;11(6):180‐5. - PubMed
Barrett 2001 {published data only}
    1. Barrett J, Goh S, Todd C, Barclay S, Daza‐Ramirez P, Vardulaki K. A description of an intermediate care service using routinely collected data. Journal of Nursing Management 2001;10:221‐227. - PubMed
Bond 1989 {published data only}
    1. Bond J, Gregson B, Atkinson A, Newell D. The implementation of a multicentred randomized controlled trial in the evaluation of the experimental National Health Service nursing homes. Age & Ageing 1989;18(2):96‐102. - PubMed
    1. Bond J, Gregson BA, Atkinson A. Measurement of Outcomes within a multicentred randomized controlled trial in the evaluation of the experimental NHS nursing homes. Age and Ageing 1989;18:292‐3012. - PubMed
Burl 1998 {published data only}
    1. Burl J, Bonner A, Rao M, Khan A. Geriatric nurse practitioners in long‐term care:demonstration of effectiveness in managed care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1998;46(4):506‐10. - PubMed
Crotty 2005 {published data only}
    1. Crotty M, Whitehead CH, Wundke R, Giles LC, Ben‐Tovim D, Phillips PA. Transitional care facility for elderly people in hospital awaiting a long term care bed: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;331:(7525):1110. - PMC - PubMed
Kane 1989 {published data only}
    1. Kane RL, Garrard J, Skay CL, Radosevich DM, Buchanan JL, McDermott SM, et al. Effects of a geriatric nurse practitioner on process and outcome of nursing home care. American Journal of Public Health 1989;79(9):1271‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Landefeld 1995 {published data only}
    1. Landefeld CS, Palmer RM, Kresevic DM, Fortinsky RH, Kowal J. A randomized trial of care in a hospital medical unit especially designed to improve the functional outcomes of acutely ill older patients. New England Journal of Medicine 1995;332(20):1338‐. - PubMed
Michael 2004 {published data only}
    1. Michael R, Wheeler B, Wichmann H, Horner B, Downie J. The healthy ageing unit: a comparative controlled intervention. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses' Association (JARNA) 2005;8:(2):9‐15.
    1. Michael R, Wichmann H, Wheeler B, Horner B, Downie J. A multidisciplinary model of transitional rehabilitation in acute aged care. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses' Association (JARNA) 2004;7:(4):10‐16.
    1. Michael R, Wichmann H, Wheeler B, Horner B, Downie J. The healthy ageing unit: beyond discharge. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses' Association (JARNA) 2005;8:(4):8‐16.
Mullen 1995 {published data only}
    1. Anon. Huddersfield NHS Trust Nurse Led Bed Unit (Report). Huddersfield NHS Trust, 1995.
    1. Mullen, C. Delivering Health Care In a Nurse‐Led Practice Development Unit. NHS Executive Value for Money Update 1995;14:6.
Nelson 1984 {published data only}
    1. Nelson D. Nurse managed rehabilitation. Nursing Management (Chicago) 1984;15(3):30‐39. - PubMed
Pioro 2001 {published data only}
    1. Pioro MH, Landefeld CS, Brennan PF, Daly B, Fortinsky RH, Kim U, et al. Outcomes‐based trial of an inpatient nurse practitioner service for general medical patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2001;7(1):21‐33. - PubMed
Shepperdson 2001 {published data only}
    1. Shepperdson B, Phelps K, Turner D, Barrett A, Wileman C. District nurse‐led beds: an alternative to care at home. British Journal of Community Nursing 2001;6(9):472‐9. - PubMed
Sitzia 1998 {published data only}
    1. Sitzia J, Haddrell V, Rice‐Oxley M. Evaluation of a nurse‐led multidisciplinary neurological rehabilitation programme using the Nottingham Health Profile. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998;12(5):389‐94. - PubMed
von Sternberg 1997 {published data only}
    1. Sternberg T, Hepburn K, Cibuzar P, Convery L, Dokken B, Haefemeyer J, et al. Post‐hospital sub‐acute care: An example of a managed care model. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 1997;45(1):87‐91. - PubMed
Wilce 1988 {published data only}
    1. Wilce G. A place like home: a radical experiment in health care. London: Bedford Square Press, 1988.

Additional references

DoH 2001
    1. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Older People. London: Department of Health, 2001.
Evans 1994
    1. Evans A, Griffiths, P. Developing a nursing led in‐patient service. London: King's Fund, 1994.
Goddard 2000
    1. Goddard M, McDonagh M, Smith D. Planning for Hospitals and Related Services. Consultation Document on the Findings of the National Beds Inquiry. In: Department of Health, editor(s). Shaping the Future NHS: Long Term Care. London: Department of Health, 2000.
Griffiths 1997
    1. Griffiths P. In search of therapeutic nursing: subacute care. Nursing Times 1997;93(26):54‐5. - PubMed
Griffiths 1998
    1. Griffiths P, Wilson‐Barnett J. The effectiveness of 'nursing beds': a review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1998;27(6):1184‐92. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Grimley Evans 2001
    1. Grimley Evans J, Tallis RC. A new beginning for care for elderly people?. British Medical Journal 2001;322(7290):807‐808. - PMC - PubMed
Hall 1969
    1. Hall LE. The Loeb Centre for Nursing and Rehabilitation, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York. International Journal Of Nursing Studies 1969;6:81‐97. - PubMed
Knowelden 1991
    1. Knowelden J, Westlake L, Wright KG, Clarke SJ. Peterborough Hospital at Home: an evaluation. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1991;13(3):182‐8. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Martin 1991
    1. Martin F, Oyewole A, Moloney A. A randomized controlled trial of a high support hospital discharge team for elderly people. Age and Ageing 1991;23:228‐34. - PubMed
McCormack 1992
    1. McCormack B. A case study identifying nursing staffs' perception of the delivery method of nursing care in practice on a particular ward. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1992;17(2):187‐97. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
NLIU 1999
    1. NLIU Evaluation Project Team. Substitution of "Nursing‐led In‐patient Units" for Acute Services. Vol. Report No. OM438., London: North Thames Regional health Authority, 1999.
Pearson 1992
    1. Pearson A, Punton S, Durant I. Nursing Beds: An evaluation of the effects of therapeutic nursing. Harrow: Scutari Press, 1992.
Shepperd 2004
    1. Shepperd S, Parkes J, McClaren J, Phillips C. Discharge Planning From Hospital To Home. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [Art. No.: CD000313. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000313.pub2.] - PubMed
Shepperd 2005
    1. Shepperd S, Iliffe S. Hospital‐at‐home versus in‐patient hospital care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [Art. No.: CD000356. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000356.pub2.] - PubMed
Steiner 1997
    1. Steiner A. Intermediate care: a conceptual framework and review of the literature. London: King's Fund, 1997.
Ward 2003
    1. Ward D, Severs M, Dean T, Brooks N. Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2003, Issue 2. [Art. No.: CD003164. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003164.] - PubMed
Wiles 2003
    1. Wiles R, Postle K, Steiner A, Walsh B. Nurse‐led intermediate care: patients' perceptions. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2003;40(1):61‐71. - PubMed
Zwarenstein 2000
    1. Zwarenstein M, Stephenson BJ, Johnston L. Effects of case management on outcomes of care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2000, Issue 4. [Art. No.: CD002797. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002797.]

References to other published versions of this review

Griffiths 2005
    1. Griffiths P, Edwards M, Forbes A, Harris R. Post‐acute intermediate care in nursing‐led units: a systematic review of effectiveness. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2005;42(1):107‐116. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources