On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one
- PMID: 17444976
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00591.x
On the relation between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one
Abstract
We investigated the relationship between the acquisition of singular-plural morpho-syntax and children's representation of the distinction between singular and plural sets. Experiment 1 tested 18-month-olds using the manual-search paradigm and found that, like 14-month-olds (Feigenson & Carey, 2005), they distinguished three objects from one but not four objects from one. Thus, they failed to represent four objects as 'plural' or 'more than one'. Experiment 2 found that children continued to fail at the 1 vs. 4 manual-search task at 20 months of age, even when told, via explicit morpho-syntactic singular-plural cues, that one or many balls are being hidden. However, 22- and 24-month-olds succeeded both with and without verbal cues. Parental report data indicated that most 22- and 24-month-olds, but few 20-month-olds, had begun producing plural nouns in their speech. Also, the success among the older children was due to those children who had reportedly begun producing plural nouns. We discuss a possible role for language acquisition in children's deployment of set-based quantification and the distinction between singular and plural sets.
Similar articles
-
Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.Cogn Psychol. 2009 Mar;58(2):195-219. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Sep 16. Cogn Psychol. 2009. PMID: 18799157 Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence for a non-linguistic distinction between singular and plural sets in rhesus monkeys.Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):603-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Mar 4. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 18164282
-
Putting singular and plural morphology in context*.J Child Lang. 2012 Sep;39(4):863-84. doi: 10.1017/S0305000911000237. Epub 2012 Jan 20. J Child Lang. 2012. PMID: 22261035
-
Argument structure and the child's contribution to language learning.Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.005. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004. PMID: 15050511 Review.
-
How language acquisition builds on cognitive development.Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Oct;8(10):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.012. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004. PMID: 15450512 Review.
Cited by
-
Representations of Abstract Relations in Infancy.Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:291-310. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00068. eCollection 2022. Open Mind (Camb). 2022. PMID: 36891038 Free PMC article.
-
Words as windows to thought: The case of object representation.Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010 Jun;19(3):195-200. doi: 10.1177/0963721410370294. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2010. PMID: 23251038 Free PMC article.
-
Array heterogeneity prevents catastrophic forgetting in infants.Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:365-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.042. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Cognition. 2015. PMID: 25543889 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Development of Children's Understanding of the Cardinality of Small Numbers and Zero.Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 25;9:1636. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01636. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 30319475 Free PMC article.
-
Factors influencing infants' ability to update object representations in memory.Cogn Dev. 2013 Jul;28(3):272-289. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.04.002. Cogn Dev. 2013. PMID: 24049245 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources